@€ That is ridiculous. You don't need to explain that to a layman, do you?!...
Another answer was actually not to be expected, as it sufficiently demonstrates "expertise"
How many systems have you planned so far and how many have you measured in practical operation?
@ Michalko:
It is not the primary goal in this diagram to depict the price increases of WP electricity or gas exactly; I have standardized here, assuming a moderate 5%. No one knows how they will actually develop in the future. It was merely intended to show that they will certainly not be lower. Anyone who wants to assume different values can convert according to their own judgment.
@ Mycraft: "yes, and due to the much lower total investment and interest, a gas condensing boiler should also be placed much lower in the graphic"
Only a rough trend is shown regarding investment costs. In many cases, for example, gas condensing boilers plus connection costs with an air heat pump are often on a similar level with the same heating load. In new buildings, for gas condensing boilers, there is still the mandatory investment in a solar thermal system, which is completely eliminated for heat pumps. That a ground source heat pump with vertical drilling usually becomes more expensive is not entirely unrealistic.
The diagram's sole purpose is to illustrate that there are significant differences, that careful planning is definitely worthwhile, and that over the course of the service life, considerable
consumption costs do accumulate.
It should be known that, in addition, other costs such as capital service, depreciation, maintenance, etc., arise or must be considered in a holistic view.
The vast majority of new buildings, at least in my planning, comply with the Energy Saving Ordinance standard or KfW 70, rarely KfW 55. Passive houses are rather the exception.
Best regards