Objection?
Sort of. The CE marking is done by the manufacturer himself. However, he has to comply with certain requirements, e.g., also how the testing is to be conducted.
There is also a checklist from the DIBt – which I have posted before – on how the CE marking must necessarily look. And here it already starts with the OP that not even the prescribed font is used. Not to mention other points.
In addition, there should also be a performance declaration for the product if it is covered, for example, by a harmonized standard in the EU. This includes, among other things, the testing of thermal conductivity according to DIN such and such. This performance declaration is also not available for the product – the contractor MUST have this performance declaration, for example, to meet the state building regulations.
Again: Without proper evidence, I could also equate a latex paint stirred by virgins at full moon with this product. At least formally. For a thermal conductivity WLG 32 (i.e., EPS or the like), the product is currently also marketed in CZ/PL/Thailand (also with correct CE marking after initial testing). That seems more realistic.