Make a plan for old building insulation - How to proceed?

  • Erstellt am 2022-08-30 10:30:12

Cronos86

2022-12-22 13:25:16
  • #1


Unfortunately, we would then have to prove that the product complies with a lambda of 0.00012 W/mK :eek:. That turns out to be difficult. (On the product data sheets from PScoat for PSC 250 T, it still says 0.034 W/mK). But if you try it yourself, it will surely become 0.00012 W/mK.
 

KarstenausNRW

2022-12-22 13:52:30
  • #2
We don't need that. I am currently waiting for the CE certificate and the performance description. Then we have the "proof" ;)
 

KarstenausNRW

2022-12-23 09:16:03
  • #3
I now have the CE declaration; there is no performance description. I am concerned about a few inconsistencies, such as the wrong font for the CE mark or the fact that the declaration is in English. It must be submitted in German. Also missing are the last two digits of the year in which the CE marking was first affixed. The reference number of the performance declaration is also missing. The harmonized standard with version (e.g. EN...) or indication of the EAD is not provided, nor is the four-digit number of the notified bodies. But apart from that, it looks good ;) . If interested: I also have TÜV + ISO certificate, application instructions, and test regulations etc. available. So go ahead, order...
 

Adam2112

2022-12-23 09:19:30
  • #4
Did you also receive references? By now all tire vulcanizers worldwide and many churches, warehouses, old buildings etc. etc. have been insulated...
 

Cronos86

2022-12-23 09:55:14
  • #5


I do not doubt the existence of the product at all. It may be approved and perfectly fine, for example for insulating hot metal surfaces. But the lambda value advertised by Adam is not realistic. And in my opinion manipulated in the "CE certificate". Or why would one change the font for an official document with the "controversial" parameter?
Oh, and why does the manufacturer state a different value for the same product in its brochures?
 

KarstenausNRW

2022-12-23 10:47:56
  • #6

I did. However, almost exclusively for industrial applications. In house construction, only a few photos in which nothing is recognizable.
The references are, however - as far as visible - from 2016/2017. Furthermore, only in PL/CZ/SK and Thailand. Besides that, not verifiable, as there is no reference regarding the application, the product, or the users.
 

Similar topics
16.08.2016Construction description, performance description, experiences12
17.05.2023No construction and performance description in GÜ for freely planned house20

Oben