All 3 properties are burdened with a land charge, thus worthless as collateral for another bank. With your bank, I could imagine that the land charge could be increased, but with 3 properties that also involves financial expenses (notary, land register, etc.).
You must always be aware of what leverage (equity and income) is for. That’s why many people with high incomes and zero equity or with a lot of equity and little income have trouble understanding why a financing arrangement is unhealthy.
My advice would be to split the building savings contract (0€ and 50k€) and have the 50k€ paid out to you.
About the building savings contract: Although 1.4% is okay, at the moment you get, for example, 1.16% interest over 10 years.
So you have 80k€ with your cash assets. I will leave the rest aside. That would pay off the land and you would still be able to contribute 40k€ as equity.
Thus you would still have to borrow 360k€ for the house and the paid off land would be included in the equity calculation.
But the total amount of liabilities at that income overwhelms me.
Even if much is on credit, it’s noticeable that for your young age and relatively low total income, you apparently must have financial support from the family. I can’t explain it otherwise.
If that’s the case and the family could step in during tight spots (rental defaults, problem tenants, car breaks down, etc.), then the 360k€ at least in the upper scenario would be worth a try.