that is already calculated very generously... According to my 5th-grade math knowledge, 120 thousand + 65 thousand + 40 thousand is 225 thousand
Where do your 65 thousand come from? We don't know the mortgage on the parents' house nor the one on apartment 1, which also lies on apartment 2. But since apartment 2 is supposed to be worth 160,000, my total amount of 300,000 should pretty accurately reflect the current real debt.
But it doesn't matter as long as the apartments are continuously rented out and the homeowners' association doesn't just decide to completely renovate the house; the apartments pay for themselves. Therefore, I gladly repeat myself: the equity fits, but in case of emergency, the income is nowhere near enough to keep the ongoing loans and a house financing alive.
It's just my personal opinion. What we can see, however, is that the topic is polarizing, precisely because it is a complicated situation. Therefore, it's good that he thinks about it beforehand and doesn't just blindly rush into it.
The currently inhabited apartment can also only be rented out once the new house is occupied, but the financing for the house must already be in place. I don't believe that a bank likes to calculate with "presumed" rental income that doesn't currently exist.
But assuming that the currently self-occupied apartment is deducted and pays for itself, then the cash assets suffice to pay off the building plot, which together with the 50,000 in the building savings plan can be considered solid equity. Fits. Building a house should work smoothly like this, but it won't be a palace.