Mycraft
2020-02-15 10:54:14
- #1
In my opinion, geothermal energy is a great alternative and the future for a small house. Sure, the costs are still high compared to gas, but as I said, gas gets more and more expensive every year.
You are on the wrong track. In fact, gas is becoming cheaper again or has more or less remained stable in price over the last 10 years. Electricity prices, on the other hand, are steadily rising, and costs for heat pumps are not still high but will also remain high as long as the prices for the technology are paid by the end user.
But basically, everything is getting more expensive, and in the long run, over 30 years, it does not really matter what you choose.
In my view, if you build new and rely on gas, you also live in the past.
Yes, that’s your opinion, and in Germany freedom of opinion prevails.
Or rather, many would also like to rely on alternative energies, but since these are usually very expensive, gas is brought into the house after all.
Certainly, many more people would heat their houses with alternative energies. But not as long as in the final analysis the sums remain as they were 20 and 10 years ago and still are today.
Most people build with heat pumps only if it is cost-neutral, or if they are absolutely convinced of it, or their minds have been clouded by salespeople, or gas becomes too expensive, not available, or too far from the house.
However, if it is associated with disproportionately higher additional costs (and this already starts with the price of the system itself), many still end up with fossil fuels. Because purely economically, it is still cheaper.
It is also interesting to see that gas is considered the cleanest fossil energy carrier for cars, and organizations like BSR, BVG, etc., rather rely on gas, which is also promoted from all sides. Including for the average consumer, but when it comes to houses, gas suddenly becomes bad and harmful and pollutes the air, etc., etc. Somehow, there is a double standard, isn’t there?
Many who build simply have the attitude that after 30 years the additional costs for a heat pump are not recouped, so it is not worth it for them.
You do not have them, you can look back at the past and convince yourself with the numbers. The technology is not new at all, even though it is always and everywhere marketed as such. It is just repackaged and somewhat more efficient. But the other heating types have also not stood still in their development.
The difference is also that with heat pumps you have to be meticulous (over the entire service life) to ensure that everything runs 100% and is optimally adjusted. Even a dirty (partial) heat exchanger or an unfavorable installation or too high comfort temperatures or whatever else can ruin the whole calculation and the presumed savings are gone. Here in the forum, questions occasionally arise like: "Hmm, the heat pump consumes too much electricity, what’s going on?"
Other heating sources are not so fussy and react more calmly to disruptive factors. I speak from experience, as I have dealt professionally and privately with both gas and heat pumps.
In my opinion, geothermal energy is a great alternative and the future for a small house.
Yes, exactly, it is an alternative, just like a car is an alternative to a bicycle. Or a house is an alternative to a rental apartment.
By the way, there were Sunday driving bans in the 70s because oil was scarce.
Precisely. Now, 50 years later, although oil has been "scarce" several times and every few years the scaremongering about ending fossil resources is revived, most still heat with fossil fuels. And the good old fireplace is even experiencing a renaissance. Oh yes, and most cars out there (worldwide) still run on petrol/diesel/gas. So what do we learn from that?