L-shaped floor plan - What is your opinion?

  • Erstellt am 2020-03-22 23:12:57

11ant

2020-05-07 15:14:36
  • #1
This could partly explain the incredible surcharge: if the five thousand only referred to concrete and steel (but would still be cheap for that). How far the building possibly moves into a different fee category for the structural engineer, I do not know.
 

haydee

2020-05-07 17:02:45
  • #2
Is not related to the fee basis of the structural engineer, but is the offered steel beam sufficient for the structural analysis? If not, [Kleingedrucktes Vertrag].

How does the sealing look for the set-back floor? Is it more work
 

11ant

2020-05-07 18:04:54
  • #3
The "Isokorb" jokes are not insignificant cost drivers here, before the energy saving ordinance I would have considered the "you'd do that after work, you don't need an invoice, darling" price more likely - hence my honestly deep astonishment about the mere five thousand.
 

Ypsi aus NI

2020-05-07 20:36:38
  • #4
What is that supposed to be?
 

11ant

2020-05-07 21:10:15
  • #5
"Isokorb" is a product name from the manufacturer Schöck for thermal insulators, which are to be installed in concrete components, for example when essentially one and the same concrete component is partly within the thermal envelope of the building (as here as a floor slab between ground floor and upper floor) and partly forms its outer shell (as here as the ceiling of only the ground floor with the roof area above before the recessed upper floor). Then the component must be divided into two parts, which are thermally independent but, of course, must remain statically connected. So it’s essentially the square of the Columbus egg. Especially at a friendly price, this undertaking is particularly ambitious. We already had this topic a while ago in this thread. Before the Energy Saving Ordinance, these projections (or also cantilevers, e.g. as porch canopies) were simply kept free of ice by thermal bridging.
 

Ypsi aus NI

2020-05-08 10:41:45
  • #6
Just a general question... How did you approach the offer comparisons? I was thinking of making a plain Excel where I list the different categories of the construction service description side by side and do the same for the quantity surveys. Do you have any other brilliant ideas?
 

Similar topics
29.04.2010Energy Saving Ordinance 2009 even without solar?16
07.06.2013Is it mandatory to build according to the Energy Saving Ordinance (2009)?12
23.10.2016Thermal insulation, Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW 70 / 55 / 40 - Your experiences31
19.06.2015Build according to KFW 70 or the Energy Saving Ordinance 201442
15.12.2019Aerated concrete exterior wall vs. Energy Saving Ordinance13
09.07.2015Energy Saving Ordinance Proof vs. Energy Saving Ordinance Proof + KfW-70 Proof13
19.10.2015New energy saving regulation from 2016 -> What to build?30
23.10.2015Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 - Gas boiler without solar?38
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
24.12.2015Single-family house, Energy Saving Ordinance 2016, developer recommends additional insulation - is it sensible?39
24.03.2016How can information such as the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 be accessed?14
09.05.2016Compliance with the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance with the following heating14
30.08.2016Construction and Performance Description - Contract including Energy Saving Ordinance 201415
11.02.2017KfW loan in 2017 for a house under the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance17
23.02.2017New construction according to the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance no longer possible without a ventilation/exhaust system?40
27.02.2017Difference between Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 and Energy Saving Ordinance 201612
14.04.2017House construction from concrete vs Energy Saving Ordinance 201631
19.07.2017How can one circumvent the Energy Saving Ordinance and avoid bureaucratic madness?162
16.07.2017Energy Saving Ordinance, KFW55, KFW40 or KFW40 Plus19

Oben