Because I am a hobby cook, the fat extraction :cool: was important to me from the beginning, because for me it also gets quite smoky (sometimes unintentionally). It is also not steamed, but preferably cooked in fat. My chrome-glossy espresso machine bears witness to each of these cooking events with a film of fat. According to a test by the Swedish equivalent of Stiftung Warentest, the best grease separators have a success rate of nearly 90% even in recirculation mode. That's already quite decent. The remaining 10% then do end up on furniture or settle deep in the controlled residential ventilation system, provided they overcome THEIR filters. To be sure of that, I want HYBRID. If that proves useless, I can always switch to recirculation. It’s just annoying when the house manufacturer doesn’t even want to deal with certification and categorically decides that a HYBRID hood transports *Attention quote! Not from me!* 6,000 m³ of air per hour outside. And always.
Exactly, that’s why I also want to plan an exhaust hood for next year at our place. In Russian cuisine, a lot is fried. That’s why I would never choose an open kitchen, even though I find it visually nice. I currently see the film of fat in our kitchen when you look at the Wi-Fi repeater on the kitchen cabinets. It is conserved for eternity :D If you order a lot and fry little in the pan, a recirculation hood can be sufficient, but so far I haven’t experienced a recirculation hood that actually captures 99%. The 10% leftovers are unfortunately more than one wants to have in the apartment. Of course, there is the option to cook differently... but do you want that??? ;)
The hybrid system sounds great, especially since I have never heard of it myself before. Until now, the best solution for me was the option via the ventilation system. The recirculation hood would also only be the "last resort" for us.
I am aware that the filters have to be changed more often, but currently I also have to do that every 2-3 months.