For me, it has nothing to do with the way the surcharge was secretly added, at least without active consultation with the kitchen studio, in the very last of all offers. The OP already describes it correctly, this is not the way to proceed when a partnership has been maintained up to that point.
I stick to my suggestion , would that work? When do you have a meeting with the studio?
Yes, exactly. We will talk to the kitchen studio again as soon as our general contractor sends us a detailed construction schedule that we can "more or less" rely on after the shell construction phase. Then we can roughly estimate whether the kitchen can be measured in time or not. This will happen next week – so we'll wait and hope that the timing works out.
I think the suggestion from is quite good. We will try to negotiate one or two months so that we don’t get into trouble having to pay the partial payment at all – that would be easiest for everyone.
Well, I don’t believe that is buried in the fine print. You don’t hide that in the terms and conditions!!
It must have been placed somewhere on the last page and is a note from the studio.
But the OP doesn’t engage at all with the proposed solutions, e.g., whether it’s feasible to have the measurement done before the deadline!?!?! They could have closed the thread after page 2 already.
Then you probably have never built a house or had a prefabricated house set up? At the moment, it is simply VERY DIFFICULT to communicate this within such a tight timeframe. It’s currently very tight for us!!! That’s why I’m so annoyed that the kitchen builder is probably messing around because of one month!
And just by the way: he knew exactly when we were going to move in roughly and what our current status is. To then simply put such a clause in writing in the very last offer is, in my opinion, just cheeky...