One month can be related to a fixed price increase from the supplier, which the kitchen builder would have to absorb. This would create a different basis for negotiation than a general clause that applies after x months in the standard offer. For a successful negotiation, it is helpful to also consider the situation of the other party. If you take some emotion out of it and start taking an interest in your business partner, a good outcome will surely result.
It’s not that I don’t understand or don’t want to understand the economic background, no question. Primarily, it’s about the manner...
In quite a few other cases, I was informed in good time (without asking) if something was coming my way.
In the kitchen sector, the planning was great, wonderful, everything was perfect, we are still very satisfied. Precisely for this reason, this "simply thrown in" 4.5% TZ (wherever it comes from?) didn’t suit us. The proposed solutions were unsatisfactory, and it certainly isn’t customary everywhere. So I’m certainly allowed to get annoyed about it and react a bit emotionally, since my counterpart definitely didn’t care about this either in this area.
But yes, ultimately a mutual solution has to be found, and I will manage that… Somehow it works out in the end.
When I created the thread, it was simply about TZ in the kitchen industry (time of offer / contract conclusion / delivery), because unfortunately I haven’t had that experience there yet. In other industries, also in the house construction industry, it is quite common that after ordering from the supplier no further TZ arises afterwards.
Unfortunately, some have digressed here and moved on to topics that simply have nothing to do with the matter, which I (unfortunately typical in forums) find really unfortunate.
But whatever, I’m already picking out the good ideas / info for myself :)