Is the cost breakdown for a single-family house plausible?

  • Erstellt am 2018-11-18 22:16:17

Milo3

2018-11-19 13:45:10
  • #1
Well, construction execution is of course a different matter... I find these generalizations like "it cost us so much" with the addition that it definitely won't be enough for you either quite annoying. You have to keep things in perspective and not destroy and badmouth every offer immediately. There are many people who drive a Dacia and are at most satisfied, while many others have a fully equipped Mercedes and are dissatisfied. Not everyone out there is a criminal. It's okay to make someone aware that they need to plan for a buffer, but you have to consider that the person might stretch their loan-to-value ratio to 90-100%. I have built 4 houses and yes, I have also calculated cautiously, but it still balanced out in a mixed calculation. If necessary, you can do without various extras. And yes, I fully stand by the fact that a site manager or architect on site will be able to better assess the situation for normal civil engineering work (without worst-case scenario —> rock) than an alleged expert from this community with his cost comparisons!
 

apokolok

2018-11-19 13:53:02
  • #2
Well, when it comes to land prices, everyone just lives in their own world. Around here, the m² in the new development area is currently going for €1200 at the notary's table, so I don't really find the €400 here that wild. What you have to consider in this case: the land is basically a pass-through item, it automatically increases the value. Sure, the liquidity has to be right, but especially in high-price regions, there is still only one direction in value development. you are probably a great theorist. Earthworks €4000 is simply nonsense, you can believe that. In my opinion, the house price itself is still unrealistic, even if the expert (who probably last looked at the prices 5 years ago) initially thinks it's acceptable.
 

Milo3

2018-11-19 13:55:24
  • #3
As I said, I still see the miscalculation... "too little" in one item, "too much" in the other.
 

ypg

2018-11-19 13:57:02
  • #4


I don’t know who is frustrated here. Those who have realized for themselves that building is too expensive are no longer here. Those who are building or have finished share their experiences here not at all frustrated. They are relieved to be done and enjoy their house.



Well, there are hardly any small numbers in construction either. I can say that out of 20 invoices, I had 2 that were in the three-digit range.



Precisely because someone relates their experience to themselves and thus limits it, it is not a generalization. It is rather intended to convey that the original poster should thoroughly address the area again and check the numbers.

No one here claims to be an expert. So please, you keep things in perspective.
 

ypg

2018-11-19 13:58:42
  • #5


Mixed calculations are only good if you know the actual costs.
 

Zaba12

2018-11-19 14:02:17
  • #6
Maybe.

I can only report to you from my perspective. The financing was set up 9 months ago. Steel has increased by 10%, windows have become 2k€ more expensive, a geothermal exchanger has been added, disposal has become 10% more expensive, etc.

So far, I have not found any item where I can say that anything compensates for the price increase.

One type of mixed calculation is probably also when there’s no money left for the outdoor area :-p
 
Oben