I have not seen a construction description before; to me, it all sounds detailed and good.
Oh, so you just wanted to know whether you are getting value for your money or cheap crap? – in that sense, we can reassure you: the description reads average, without any wow or ouch. Plain like a thousand others.
But whether something is missing, or I should ask something else, I unfortunately cannot judge. Therefore, here is my question.
Absolutely nothing is missing in the sense that there is no standard about what (at minimum) must be described and how exactly – therefore, there is no clear completeness benchmark. Whether and what
relatively is missing, only
you can judge, the standard for that is
your expectations. However, this will inevitably require you to engage with the topic. What do you actually understand about condominiums: are you aware of a homeowners’ association as well as common property, usage rights, monthly fees, and so on?
I do not want any special treatment.
Maybe after all:
The floor is getting more expensive; we want to have wood-look tiles installed.
The question is what you are even allowed to decide here. Worst case, only a selection from the developer’s sample palette. It is also important: what you can procure today, don’t postpone until tomorrow. This means: before signing the purchase contract, you negotiate confidently with the developer. Once the building is completed and handed over, everything is connected to the property, and for interventions in the building’s substance you ask the owners’ assembly. Many condominium newbies naively believe a flat can be bought like a house, then they have free disposal over it, and with the one-time purchase price everything is done. Not at all. You do not buy an apartment but a special right of use; the homeowners’ association must be managed and that costs money (and is apportioned as you know it from being a tenant).