*Dipol*
2022-01-13 23:42:30
- #1
I’ll pick up the older post:
Primary responsibility for antenna safety lies with the IEC or DIN EN 60728-11 (VDE 0855-1), which unfortunately contains neither a recommendation to route grounding conductors from antennas preferably on the outside nor requires compliance with separation distances calculated according to IEC or DIN EN 62305-3 (VDE 0185-305-3), even though their compliance would be sensible from a lightning protection perspective.
This also applies to photovoltaic cables, which—like antenna grounding conductors—are often routed as lightning conductors through the building with dangerous proximity. A previous rule that grounding conductors for antennas may not be routed together with coaxial cables no longer exists. Lightning that has traveled kilometers from the clouds to the earth can be controlled with HVI cables, but not with a 1 mm cable sheath.
In the current valid version of the standard, it is required that accessible grounding conductors must be installed in a PVC conduit with a 3 mm wall thickness. In the next edition of IEC 60728-11, this passage has been removed.
This standard, responsible for photovoltaic systems, thus explicitly requires that IF a bonding conductor is installed, it must be routed as close as possible to the photovoltaic cables to avoid inductive lightning current coupling from nearby strikes.
CONCLUSION: Anyone who objectively wants to exclude rare direct strikes must have protectable roof installations protected with separate lightning rods according to the state of the art.
No, you are not allowed. Actually, for the satellite dish you even need two empty conduits. One for the antenna cables and one for the 16qmm lightning protection conductor. Otherwise, the separation distance according to DIN VDE is not maintained. This is very often done incorrectly in practice.
Primary responsibility for antenna safety lies with the IEC or DIN EN 60728-11 (VDE 0855-1), which unfortunately contains neither a recommendation to route grounding conductors from antennas preferably on the outside nor requires compliance with separation distances calculated according to IEC or DIN EN 62305-3 (VDE 0185-305-3), even though their compliance would be sensible from a lightning protection perspective.
This also applies to photovoltaic cables, which—like antenna grounding conductors—are often routed as lightning conductors through the building with dangerous proximity. A previous rule that grounding conductors for antennas may not be routed together with coaxial cables no longer exists. Lightning that has traveled kilometers from the clouds to the earth can be controlled with HVI cables, but not with a 1 mm cable sheath.
In the current valid version of the standard, it is required that accessible grounding conductors must be installed in a PVC conduit with a 3 mm wall thickness. In the next edition of IEC 60728-11, this passage has been removed.
712.54 Grounding systems, protective conductors, and protective equipotential bonding conductors
If protective equipotential bonding conductors are installed, they must be installed parallel to and in as close contact as possible with the DC and AC cables/wires and accessories.
This standard, responsible for photovoltaic systems, thus explicitly requires that IF a bonding conductor is installed, it must be routed as close as possible to the photovoltaic cables to avoid inductive lightning current coupling from nearby strikes.
CONCLUSION: Anyone who objectively wants to exclude rare direct strikes must have protectable roof installations protected with separate lightning rods according to the state of the art.