Deliverer
2020-03-05 14:32:48
- #1
I just always sleep so badly there, cook, do home office, and the like...People who appreciate nature and fresh air and the scent of garden, forest, and meadow better find other ways than to hide hermetically sealed buildings in summer and winter.
Compared to the energy we waste on heating, a small amount. In my old building, which I keep below 24 degrees, it's about a factor of 60.So we build air conditioners on top of that. Great energy saving.
In this case, I would equip the gallery as far up as possible with a single unit, which should then run as continuously as possible (from May to October) to keep the house dry and cool in combination with the underfloor cooling. I will gladly prepare the other rooms – I guess you won’t need it.Additionally, you will find the current floor plans with the marking of which rooms should possibly be equipped with an air conditioner as well as some pictures of the exterior view.
That is – especially in a new building – too expensive. Rough rule of thumb: €1,000/kW cooling capacity. A new building should not need more than 5 kW. If you operate the unit like your heating (turn on in summer, turn off), often just one indoor unit is enough to go from "I’m dying" to "this is bearable." Especially in combination with underfloor cooling. If you want to maintain 20° continuously, you have to spend a bit more. But nowhere near €15,000.The first offer for equipping the four rooms with a multi-split air conditioner amounts to around €15,000 including materials and installation!
I have two reference points: 140 sqm old building, continuous cooling at 23-24°, 500 kWh, so €150 per year. 135 sqm new building, cooling as needed, 300 kWh, so €90 per year. These are the average values from the last two or three summers. And they were not exactly cold. I consider that negligible.Why is the electricity consumption negligible?