No one wants to harm you and as much as I understand that you currently feel attacked regarding yourself and your lifestyle, I must also point out that you do not give the impression of actually having your finances under control... and checking this circumstance was your concern here, wasn't it?
In your 2nd post on page 1 of this topic, you write that you have "2541,- euros left after deducting all expenses." On page 3 you then attach your breakdown, which results in 1750,- and suddenly (after correction) only shows 1450,- euros, but that does not stop you from continuing to calculate with the 1041,- "reserve" later on, which results from the difference of the original 2541,- and the installment plus additional costs. And from this very "reserve," you mentally cover every item you overlooked in your breakdown (clothing, vacation, tires, barbecue party, birthdays, repairs, special repayments, child, etc.). What actual "reserve" remains if one of you is unemployed for even a few months?
By the way: 820,- warm rent + 70,- parking space + 65,- electricity + 17.50 GEZ + 30,- internet/phone amounts to 1000,- euros, but you give 1200,- for this position - what else is included there?
Food is totally unimportant to you and cooking is no big deal, then every day healthy cooking with mostly meat again, even though at least you only eat warm once a day and do so free of charge in the canteen. And all that for 300,- euros (which, by the way, is less than the state allocates to a family of three for food costs under Hartz IV!) from which all other household items also have to be paid.
Maybe you really are such frugal people (I once saw a documentary about "couponing," that was impressive) and a bit lucky with "fate." But if you are really interested in a critical assessment, you should probably be advised to either save longer or buy cheaper.
And because I just happened to discover it, regarding insurances:
The basis of every wealth accumulation (and that is what buying a house is about) should be the coverage of existential risks. I understand that not everyone is eager to deal with this topic, but one should get through it before eventually realizing that the policy one was talked into during training is unfortunately useless or, in the worst case, not insured at all.
You specify 233,- euros for insurance (yours) in the breakdown, of which 80,- euros go to life risk, liability, and accident (2x liability is still nonsense, by the way). This leaves 153,- euros, which supposedly also includes the company pension scheme, which you already accounted for in your net income in your initial post as "directly deducted from gross." So is this now 153,- euros Riester, or something else?
However, the problem remains that you rely on both incomes but only have the loss of income due to death of an earner insured. A life insurance for your wife is missing, and also a disability insurance for both in principle. Instead, you prefer an insanely expensive accident insurance, yet see no need for action.
I want to emphasize again that I really do not mean it badly, but the overall picture shows me that you / you all do not really have an overview of your financial situation at the moment and / or represent it differently here as needed, and in this case, you should definitely be advised against buying a house for 320,000 euros, as either it does not add up or your information does not allow an assessment.