You really messed up there.
At 4.5% interest and a €296,000 loan, you pay (e.g. with 1% repayment) €233,000 in interest.
With 2% repayment, you’re at €193,000 – so for us around €200,000 (without special repayments).
€200,000 + €296,000 would then be the correct way, so €496,000.
Correct me if I’m wrong.
Is it really such a bad deal as Hanghaus says?
Such a calculation of interest and repayment as a total sum over the term is nonsensical and, as a standalone statement, basically good for nothing.
If anything, please put it in relation to alternatives. For example, house rent of over €1,500 and 30 years, e.g. ==> so €540,000 expenses without rent increases over the next 30 years. And alongside that, please also an additional savings rate to accumulate the €296,000 (I assume the property value would be that high after 30 years) in 30 years.
So to be comparable with the above calculation, having spent €496,000 after 30 years and owning a debt-free house, the renter would have to spend about €840,000 in the same time (of course, he gets interest on his savings but that may be balanced out by rent increases).
Which deal is then better? Renting or buying? No matter how you calculate...