OWLer
2019-05-22 19:35:25
- #1
Thank you very much for the answers!
That’s how I see it too. I will ask the notary about the freedom of choice and the duration. I have no fundamental objections to a gas heating system. It’s just a pity that I have to build a chimney then.
There is nothing about that in the development plan or I will take another look at it later. As far as I understand, everyone involved assumed that the municipal utilities would of course lay gas. Then it got serious and they said, “It’s not worth it, we won’t do it.” That now seems to be the result that all buyers get this clause in the contract. I hope this is not officially recorded anywhere.
No, the seller is indirectly a farmer who is cashing in his land and directly a "Bauentwicklungs GmbH". The city has nothing to do with the construction area except for the approval. I will ask the city whether there is or will be a building encumbrance or something recorded in the land register. At the moment it is still farmland; surveying and parceling are currently underway.
With gas and the option to switch (I would definitely check THAT) you are better off than those who have such a compulsion for district heating or similar with monopoly prices and minimum purchase obligations, which unfortunately is also permitted.
If you have concerns, then insulate very well and without calculation tricks. Photovoltaics always make sense (still), for heating it is not so relevant.
You can also use a second heat source later, like a heat pump, and decide for yourself how much gas you take and when.
That’s how I see it too. I will ask the notary about the freedom of choice and the duration. I have no fundamental objections to a gas heating system. It’s just a pity that I have to build a chimney then.
I find it somewhat alarming that there is a connection obligation in the gas sector and am not sure if it is possible – at least it must be recorded in the development plan and thus tolerated by the municipality.
There is nothing about that in the development plan or I will take another look at it later. As far as I understand, everyone involved assumed that the municipal utilities would of course lay gas. Then it got serious and they said, “It’s not worth it, we won’t do it.” That now seems to be the result that all buyers get this clause in the contract. I hope this is not officially recorded anywhere.
But I wonder, who is the seller? The city?
The rights from the purchase contract must first be enforced by someone. Unless this obligation is recorded in the land register in favor of the municipal utilities, I wonder how they want to enforce their supposed right?
No, the seller is indirectly a farmer who is cashing in his land and directly a "Bauentwicklungs GmbH". The city has nothing to do with the construction area except for the approval. I will ask the city whether there is or will be a building encumbrance or something recorded in the land register. At the moment it is still farmland; surveying and parceling are currently underway.