Garden landscaper offer ok or rather totally exaggerated?

  • Erstellt am 2018-09-15 17:40:16

Alex85

2018-09-17 06:31:59
  • #1
I just wanted to point out that redacting a specification created by provider A and passing it on to provider B constitutes a copyright infringement. Since this is being recommended here constantly.
 

Egberto

2018-09-17 07:22:06
  • #2
I find that as an approach an interesting consideration. However, not every intellectual work is protected but requires a certain level of creativity. This is usually not given in the case of a plain bill of quantities, where a craftsman only lists various material items.
 

Kekse

2018-09-17 09:40:12
  • #3
Especially since the planning (of which the preparation of the [Leistungsverzeichnis] is probably a part) was apparently paid for here.
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2018-09-17 10:02:25
  • #4
I have also received the indication that the issue of warranty becomes problematic when the garden landscaping trade is split up. It is partly more difficult than in interior construction.

Also in gardening, I have heard of cases where experts, lawyers, clients, and gardeners had problems with each other. Therefore, I am now doing it so that I look at which seemingly reputable companies give feedback, and if there is not more than a 20% difference anywhere, then it will simply be commissioned as it is (3% discount must, however, be included).
 

Alex85

2018-09-17 18:58:57
  • #5


Not a consideration but concrete practice from the environment of our architects. If the concept has been paid for, of course, that is something different.
 

Egberto

2018-09-17 19:23:59
  • #6
Well, one can imagine that craftsmen naturally do not like that: nobody nowadays likes to conduct price negotiations. However, that does not mean it constitutes a copyright infringement, even if one might initially claim it as a deterrent.
 
Oben