K a t j a
2022-10-18 13:00:57
- #1
Basically, I agree, but 1.20 m is simply not even half a floor. A basement would quickly protrude more than 1.40 m above the level and then would hardly have anything to do with a cellar. With this gradient, a bungalow should be just possible. In the north corner, the window sills then end flush with the turf. (I hope I read it correctly: the slope drops 2.60 m from north to south across your property? Otherwise please correct me – in which corner is your highest point?) However, an entrance in the northeast would again require quite a bit of excavation with supports for the path. An entrance in the south would probably be more favorable. Sketched here, with the natural terrain intentionally left unchanged to get a feel for the terrain.If the single-story design is desired by the authority, but there is a slope throughout the entire building/residential area, in my opinion it is a good statement of the development plan to at least allow the basement to be built as a full floor.
However, with the distances and your giant bungalow, in my opinion the garage will be tight. You can’t reproduce everything exactly, but from the overview you can already see that it’s problematic with a 4 m free driveway. The garage here measures 6.20 m as an outer square dimension. And your bungalow does not yet even have the 40 cm outer walls, right? So about 40 cm is still missing from the 17.4 m. That’s quite a monster.
I couldn’t warm up to the bungalow with 3 kids + study anyway. I see this much more as a normal single-story house with an expanded attic. Of course, one would have to know more precisely from where the 9 m height applies and what maximum roof pitch is actually permitted? Therefore, here again is the question about the previously rejected drafts with reasoning.