I am planning a house for up to 7 people, sorry that my family planning does not fit into your scheme, but I plan according to my ideas and the architect has considered all my requirements, wishes, and ideas, which another architect rejected in the preliminary discussion.
The architect is both an architect and a structural engineer.
A little something about me, I am not a convertible Porsche driver like most here, but a minibus driver in the basic version.
A little off-topic because this forum probably should be renamed:
I am happy for you that you have not yet experienced the following risks. Separation after taking out a loan, e.g., planning phase, execution phase, completion phase, move-in phase, adjustment phase. Selling the house because the children's rooms are not enough (another child/double happiness), new partner, different profession, job loss, caring for relatives. Change of workplace. So according to your "expertise" shown here, one should only start building a house or even planning if this is 100% excluded, many thanks...
I have to agree with @Gerddieter here. I can mention that some doors are poorly... positioned, also that the granny flat gets better space utilization if the entrance is placed sideways, or the common rooms are not planned almost square, but if you already poorly plan the guest room and also realize that this room can hardly be used as a bedroom, why on earth don’t you plan this room better? There is enough space...?! And why should one feel comfortable in a bathroom that is not even 4 sqm when old?
The granny flat is modeled after Virtus Massivhaus. If you rotated it, it would not be compatible with the plot.
Unfortunately, I don’t understand any of your inspirations. The guest room is for guests, not for old age. If that were the case, it would probably be called an old-age room. When I become old and gray, I would move into the granny flat, same with the bathroom. It is only for the first two years and then at most for guests, but I suppose an open bathroom directly in the living room would naturally be better for you?!?
Sorry YPG, I will not comment further on
How big / tall are the houses in the area?
The neighboring buildings are 8.7 meters and 9.8 meters on one side. On the other side they are 11.6 meters and 11.7 meters.
That was the goal. To make subdivision into four units possible. At least that’s what the OP writes.
It looks that way too
Yes, exactly, the goal was to design everything modularly.
That’s wishful thinking. Far from any reality. Do you then want to retrofit stairs, change entrances, conjure up parking spaces, etc.? More has to be invested in planning.
Um, okay, maybe you understand “subdivision” differently than I do, but the subdivision is obvious. Depending on the division, only short drywall partitions with doors must be installed, but I understand that you have never seen or even done something like this. Parking spaces really, aren’t 7 parking spaces enough for you? Should I plan 14 parking spaces for 7 people or rather 21 parking spaces?
It’s a pity that so far only one person has mentioned the chimney, called it a fireplace, but at least he tried...
Maybe someone will still say something about ceiling height or parapet height over the weekend. I’m curious.