And to be honest, I am surprised why the draft is received so negatively. What are the underlying reasons that everyone sees what is planned here as such a big disaster? I really don’t get it yet. What do I gain if I plan the mentioned hillside house with 2 instead of 3 levels?
You are surprised? You yourself have made some observations.
Bedroom upstairs seems too big, dressing room too small, possible children’s bathroom upstairs?, undecided whether the layout of the bathroom upstairs is good. TV corner somewhat small?, strange unused space behind the couch in the corner.
Your wishes:
Tendentially rather open, so that the existing space appears as large as possible.
Is that the case on the upper floor?
modern construction method
Is this city villa modern? You personally gain more quality of life by having barrier-free access to your garden. Also, you save the costs of a basement, which here basically only replaces the slab. With only two levels you have the utility rooms where you need them. You can go out through your terrace doors without the risk of falling. You don’t need fall protection. With individual planning you get almost everything you want. Visually, a city villa placed on a hillside is not exactly a highlight. Considering the whole thing ecologically, it doesn’t exactly increase the value of the plot. One could almost say that a BoPa house is being forced into the hillside. Ok, with the help of a basement. But whether a utility basement is really the better level for garden access, I doubt.