We deliberately led the staircase from the living area to the upper floor because we don't like the "classic" variant (from the entrance).
There is 2.60m of space between the terrace door and the staircase. That should be enough for a dining area, right?
I basically think it's better too (without children). But at least one meter in front of the staircase should be planned as a traffic area without a chair in the way. And try drawing a proper dining table there: it should be about 2 meters long.
As I learned today, Neufert says 3.2 m - we are planning 3.7 m. So no, 2.6 m is not enough.
:D:D:D
Now in general: the house seems... compact to me. Was there a basement? The house is (relatively) small, meant for 5 people. Some plan children's rooms with lots of space (in size), here it goes down to <12 sqm again. Somehow it will work, up there. It has to :) But I don’t understand the staircase, which takes up the most space of all staircases. Having one square meter more of actual living space here and there would certainly be nice – even if it only becomes a storage room on the upper floor. Downstairs, despite all the nonsense of the classic variant, I would turn the staircase, and throw the kitchen walls in the trash: the hallway between kitchen and staircase makes no sense as wasted space at all. Then shorten the living room wall a bit and put the fireplace under the stairs (is that allowed?) The drawn-in furniture shows it clearly: as it is now, there is no way through, instead the kitchen has a lot of extra space.
Question: is this a semi-detached house, or why is there no window on the east side?
But: as my predecessors said: new, please!
Regards Yvonne