Experience annual billing KfW70 house, high energy efficiency

  • Erstellt am 2016-04-12 19:12:15

Legurit

2016-07-05 14:55:41
  • #1
As already written... what generates the energy is totally irrelevant... It only depends on a) investment costs b) costs per unit of energy Depending on how much is consumed, one or the other wins...
 

T21150

2016-07-05 17:25:12
  • #2


Hello Stefan,

that's not so impressive at all. Although the values are okay and a reason to be happy.

A friend of mine has a similar house to mine (same manufacturer, very similar size, but with a basement, we both have KFW-70 standard and the houses range in values between 70 and 55).

The two are not as cold-sensitive as I am and had even slightly lower consumption in 15/16, although the winters in AB are certainly harsher than here in Velbert.

I think with 8.5T kWh you are not that far off for 200 sqm living space. That would be 42 kWh/sqm/year (heating energy consumption, not primary energy consumption). Anyway: The heating / hot water doesn’t make you poor. Taxes, garbage etc. are much more expensive.

In my house, the air-to-water heat pump currently makes no sense, because as I said, I chose radiators (because my wife and I don’t like underfloor heating). I would have to run the heat pump with too high a flow temperature, which severely affects efficiency. Of course, too high a flow temperature at ground source affects the coefficient of performance, which is why I drastically lowered the flow temperature, and the aforementioned builder even runs 5-7 degrees lower. We don't freeze doing so. The principle is: properly adjusted heating curve and running the heating continuously, no setback. Basically like underfloor heating, just with 15-17 degrees more flow temperature.

Let's see what happens in about 10 years with energy prices. Why 10 years? Well – that’s roughly the lifetime of a gas boiler in prognosis. Some last 8. Others 14-15. Then one can see what is on the market by then.

Personally, I am glad to have a gas connection in the house. Also for new technologies that will come, it will certainly be usable. I would also have enough electricity – photovoltaic, so I do not generally exclude an air-to-water heat pump (with better values at high flow temperature in 10 years) as a replacement.

Best regards
Thorsten
 

Rumbi441

2018-03-13 20:30:10
  • #3
Are there already newer experiences... almost 3 years in use now
 

Similar topics
20.10.2016Water-bearing fireplace stove floor heating, heat pump, photovoltaic, new construction?28
18.04.2015House construction, KFW70, approx. 150m², which heating? Gas/air-water heat pump?36
09.06.2015Gas, heat pump, and solar for a single-family house?36
22.11.2015HvH combines air heat pump with panel radiators - temperature values?29
29.05.2019Gas or heat pump? Experiences / Feedback115
13.12.2019Gas with solar thermal or heat pump? And possibly photovoltaics?13
27.01.2020Properly setting the air-to-water heat pump with underfloor heating54
05.12.2020Gas with solar thermal? Or heat pump with photovoltaics? Consultation149
12.11.2021Central room temperature controller for ERR underfloor heating76
04.01.2022Air-water heat pump current consumption and data1439
14.12.2020Underfloor heating heat load calculation - simply explained?26
20.01.2021Air-to-water heat pump consumption at 30 kWh per day52
17.07.2021Underfloor heating and air-to-water heat pump in new construction: am I going to have problems?28
08.10.2021Air-water heat pump combined with underfloor heating does not work properly65
26.03.2022Which is more sensible: heat pump or insulation?33
25.03.2022Switching from gas to solar / photovoltaic with / without heat pump31
12.02.2023Hybrid heating: Is a heat pump with a gas condensing boiler sensible in old buildings?26
22.02.2024Heat pumps require a lot of energy and make noise73
06.01.20251980s terraced house with underfloor heating - heat pump?10

Oben