Gudeen.
2022-01-31 16:32:26
- #1
Don’t get me wrong: I find heat pumps fascinating technology and would like to have one too if the conditions are right. Unfortunately, that’s not the case for us with a house built in 1983 and 400m2 of space, despite KFW100EE renovation. The difference to the geothermal heat pump with 4 boreholes and pellet system was more than 20k euros before subsidies. That makes the pellet system simply more sensible as the "least evil climate option." A large part of the old building stock in Germany is not easily suitable for an air-water heat pump. Period. Unless you want to pay an arm and a leg.
It may be that pellets were the most economical option for you, but what’s with the talk about a large part of the old building stock when it’s specifically about a house from 1996 that would already be well insulated with a few new windows? No one claims it makes sense to install heat pumps in unrenovated old buildings. However, in combination with appropriate insulation and conversion to underfloor heating, it is usually the best alternative.