ruppsn
2018-04-06 21:48:11
- #1
I would also have them open inwards, just as they are drawn there.
I find outward opening impractical. To use the argument that the door was designed to open outwards:
Exactly, think about how often you have visitors who say goodbye and someone needs to quickly use the potty box again. You regularly get "jams" there. Experienced that thousands of times in my childhood when relatives visited the parental home, which was quite similar, only with a door opening outwards.
The rescue idea is not fundamentally wrong, but for me much rarer (hopefully never). And if it should ever happen that someone collapses and the emergency services need to get in, they will get in, since it is usually not a high-security door.
The only consideration for me would be if the door were executed as a flush variant.
I find sliding doors for the "public" restroom somewhat suboptimal due to sound and locking issues. There may be solutions, but aren't they comparatively expensive?
I find outward opening impractical. To use the argument that the door was designed to open outwards:
Exactly, think about how often you have visitors who say goodbye and someone needs to quickly use the potty box again. You regularly get "jams" there. Experienced that thousands of times in my childhood when relatives visited the parental home, which was quite similar, only with a door opening outwards.
The rescue idea is not fundamentally wrong, but for me much rarer (hopefully never). And if it should ever happen that someone collapses and the emergency services need to get in, they will get in, since it is usually not a high-security door.
The only consideration for me would be if the door were executed as a flush variant.
I find sliding doors for the "public" restroom somewhat suboptimal due to sound and locking issues. There may be solutions, but aren't they comparatively expensive?