Cost estimation for building an architect-designed house - Munich surrounding area

  • Erstellt am 2022-05-12 00:01:25

11ant

2022-05-12 14:21:28
  • #1

You probably still wrote while I had already sent post #23. If you follow the approach I advised there, you will get the answer that way. Otherwise: get in touch :)

Caution: Architect-designed houses and prefab houses are NOT opposites or parallel alternatives, but have a significant overlap. Especially in the house size asked about here, there are even prefab house manufacturers who specialize in pampering privately insured clients with gold-rimmed marble palaces that can "even shock " and that achieve at most two stars less than the villa of ;-)
 

Benutzer200

2022-05-12 14:22:36
  • #2
No. Even within the scope of prefabricated house construction, an architect is needed, as you are not buying off the shelf. Only the construction method differs, nothing else.
 

Gerddieter

2022-05-12 14:44:32
  • #3
What shocks me most is the guild of architects – but old hat, I'm just traumatized... for that, I still find butchers and meat cutters quite okay so far... I am trying to answer this from my experience shaped by suffering whether I get more value for money from the "prefab manufacturer": 1. This cannot be answered; from my experience, the prefab manufacturer was always more expensive for the same design than the turnkey general contractor from the neighboring town... 2. Planning with an architect is definitely more expensive, you pay HOAI and not a "flat" 5 thousand to the prefab manufacturer for planning services. 3. All the other service phases also cost more according to HOAI than when offered by the general contractor. 4. For that, with architect-led construction, you can compare bids from trades and choose the best = cheaper than with the general contractor. I decided in favor of planning with an architect but to save my nerves in the long run "build with a general contractor." GD
 

11ant

2022-05-12 15:15:16
  • #4
I have now looked at the location in (you could have linked the two threads yourself!) and don't directly see 1000 sqm of land there: does approximately 1522/3 also belong to the plot in question besides 1522/6? – although there is a boundary line in between, it might still be worth trying a merger in order to be able to increase the site coverage ratio a bit. The building envelope would still remain "not comfortable" in size and layout; at least an extension of the main building envelope into the Ga building envelope for only the normal building setback on this side would be very helpful. Our tradition as a butcher dynasty was already not continued by my father, and a butcher’s house... I think / have even sent more general contractors into the desert than has worn out expert assessors ;-) Anyone who knows me can guess which song by Katja Ebstein comes to my mind in this context *LOL* *SCNR*
 

gregman22

2022-05-12 19:12:38
  • #5


11ant, now you’ve unsettled me :) I have uploaded a somewhat larger section again. So if you ask me, nothing at all merges with the property. The area marked in yellow is 99% likely my target plot of 1060 sqm.

Can you briefly explain what you mean by “extension of the main window into the Ga-building plot also on this side”?

Since we are on the subject: horizontally next to it there is this shed built. Above it, one might possibly achieve an extended building area. What do you think?
 

11ant

2022-05-12 19:59:30
  • #6
Okay, it is probably larger than it "appears" at first glance, but if the recorded numbers are roughly correct, it should still be only about 780 sqm by rough estimate and without guarantee ;-) (rounded with a floor area ratio of 0.2, that would fit with about 155 sqm). If it is only about this one parcel, of course there is nothing to merge, pardon, "to unite" would be the correct term here. To the east, you have a 4m wide distance from the building window to the border, to the west, however, with 6m, even double the usual minimum building setback. Having only 3m on both sides would allow the house to be 3m wider in total. This would allow the house to use its possible footprint even if it were set back from the street further than the current existing house does.
 

Similar topics
09.04.2014Questions/neglected plot/meadow, determining construction measures44
11.02.2015Cost planning for a single-family house including land, additional costs, architect32
12.09.2022Feedback on our floor plan idea, small building window127
08.09.2015Massive house by the architect, approximate costs?16
15.08.2016Property - Building window - Location of house and garage44
20.05.2016Construction project of this volume feasible?21
09.08.2016Small plot and corner bungalow26
12.12.2016Basement yes or no with a large building window?12
04.04.2017Building without building window NRW13
31.01.2017Building window on the corridor map - approval39
08.06.2018130 m² bungalow with double carport on a 600 m² plot?64
15.08.2018Basic floor area ratio / floor area ratio for plots without a development plan: How to calculate? Experiences?18
28.02.2019HOAI or why architects have no interest.....38
09.04.2019Orientation of the house on the property - fewer retaining walls?21
16.10.2019Bungalow - does it make sense on a plot like this?21
28.07.2020Single-family house 160m2 with basement, 500m2 plot108
11.09.2020Stepped floor house 23x30m plot with floor area ratio 0.2525
24.11.2020Actually divide the property but both have the same building rights69
24.11.2022Floor plan single-family house approx. 300 sqm, plot 780 sqm24
20.06.2025Semi-detached house in building area 8.5m x 15m (WxD)76

Oben