Construction project with architects

  • Erstellt am 2015-11-08 09:58:25

Sebastian79

2015-11-10 21:44:52
  • #1
Don’t be mad at me, but what you believe you can throw in the trash - on construction sites, it’s a completely different world.

And suit-wearers are pretty much the last thing they can stand :D. And your architect can check all he wants - with all due respect, but he’s not there for every trowel stroke or every screw. He can’t check many things at all.

Like I said, it was just a well-intentioned tip :).

You’re building for the first time like me - on top of that, you’re so early in, but you really think you know what’s going on? Think that over...
 

merlin83

2015-11-10 21:45:50
  • #2

Hopefully we will have the solution to the mystery in summer 2016 :cool:
 

nordanney

2015-11-10 21:51:52
  • #3
Good luck!

In individual trade contracts, you can of course also be quick - we started in October and then moved in in May (project management done by ourselves). Considering that there was a winter in between, that's not bad.
 

Bauexperte

2015-11-10 22:13:35
  • #4
Good evening,


In this regard, there should be a more differentiated distinction in my opinion.

Usually, when the contract is awarded via the architect, the craftsmen who regularly work with the architect are also predominantly commissioned. Here, the long-standing cooperation as well as timely information of the trades come into play.

Deviations often occur when the architect is commissioned by means of an extensive tender (usually 3 per trade), because then price rather than quality determines the decision. Gaps in the time frame can also occur if the clients have preferences regarding certain craftspeople with whom they have not or have not frequently worked before. The same applies to EL below the construction period.

In my experience, there is no significant difference in the construction time (for new builds) between awarding via architect (with regular craftsmen) and general contractors/GÜ. Because both have agreed contractual penalties if delivery deadlines are not met. Both also usually include "time buffers" when specifying the construction period.


That is certainly true and ultimately also human ;)

Rhenish greetings from on the road
 

merlin83

2015-11-10 22:44:43
  • #5
 

Bauexperte

2015-11-10 22:51:32
  • #6
Good evening,


You're welcome; my answer is ultimately based only on personal experience with both methods ;)

Rhenish regards
 

Similar topics
19.07.2018Draw the plan yourself? Do you necessarily need an architect?11
18.02.2011Architect totally messed up - experiences?17
30.09.2012Final invoice architect13
27.10.2013Architect --> Agreements? What is that?21
16.04.2014Cost of soil survey - Does the architect pay or do we?12
16.09.2014Termination of collaboration with architect - demands excessive fee28
01.10.2014Collaboration with an architect - how does it work properly?22
25.02.2015Planning / Architect, involvement of specialist planners for the approval plan10
18.03.2015Developer information varies. What is the realistic construction time?19
10.04.2015Cost estimate architect single-family house. Your assessment44
26.04.2015Semi-detached house architect or general contractor / prefabricated house or solid construction13
27.12.2015Who has built with an architect? Experiences??85
11.09.2015Building a garage on the boundary is not possible according to the architect.11
17.11.2015Is an architect really that expensive?46
05.04.2020Developer or architect - costs43
07.03.2016Various dimensions architect execution drawing12
23.09.2016Architect and budget limit... insurance? possibilities25
17.04.2017Civil Engineer vs. Architect17
13.06.2017Architect or developer? Which is more affordable?13
24.06.2017Construction ancillary costs: Bank requires signature from the architect16

Oben