Thank you for this report! 15 months of construction time is certainly quite a lot. How exactly were your works defined for the bids? I currently can't imagine how I could design a tender. Therefore, I would probably leave it to the architect. Did you get through the construction phase without defects?
There wasn’t much involved in the tenders. They weren’t really tenders in that sense. We looked for companies and got offers. Of course, you have to know what you want and inform yourself. Here in the Bavarian Forest, most people build in this way. We did have one or two defects. But everything could be clarified, everything was reworked. What more can an architect do there? In the end, the 100,000 we saved are definitely worth it. Or rather, the extra performance we got. With a general contractor, we would have had a standard house with the cheapest fittings!! Okay, 15 months is long. But compared to the savings, it quickly puts things into perspective. Moving into a damp house is not the point either. A couple of friends built a year before us, also got offers themselves and wanted to build with a general contractor before. At first, I didn’t believe that they saved 100,000… The advantage was also that with every company we could negotiate on the offers. Between 3-7% was common. Architects and general contractors keep that to themselves. As I said, most people here build like this, and so far I don’t know anyone who hasn’t managed it.