Yes, that would be an option, right! Or somewhere between Lensahn and Kiel – so towards Lütjenburg. But we don’t know anything for sure yet. It depends on the school; we also don’t know where we’ll be accepted. We don’t want the regular school here, but there are still some other options in SH. Basically, I assume that the house will cost about the same and I have already generously budgeted 150,000 for the land because it shouldn’t be small or unattractive building land. Of course, I know that with that budget I won’t get anything great near bigger cities, but something should be possible in the countryside.
What still unsettles me about the question between an architect and a general contractor is this: I understand that an architect might have more ideas and can certainly bring clever ideas. But I can also imagine that a more practice-oriented entrepreneur has his place – because I don’t really know any architects, so it would be “just any architect” for me. And they don’t all perform miracles anyway... creativity is definitely not lacking for us, it would mainly be about feasibility. And I am personally more practically inclined and, as mentioned, don’t need anything particularly fancy. However, at the beginning I also assumed that an architect would have to be involved. What I’d be interested in is: from when do I have to pay for the question of feasibility? Let’s assume I come with a few basic ideas, have some CAD drawings with me, and am now looking for either a general contractor or an architect – who charges for what at what point?
Background of the question: my parents once planned a house extension. There were offers ranging from 25,000 euros to 70,000 euros. The range was so wide that I don’t want to rely on just two opinions and would definitely spend time looking for the right person/company. Not to find the cheapest at all costs, but to find the one who is simply best overall. If I had to pay a few thousand each time, I wouldn’t be very happy...