City villa floor plan 155 sqm - your opinion is requested

Well everyone. Without pictures it’s hard to assess. So far it still looks very much like "scatter windows" to me. Can’t your program show views?

The windows on the upper floor with a parapet height of 65 and 45 have a stainless steel rod fall protection. I can’t depict that, the floor-to-ceiling one will have a transom. Unfortunately, my program can’t do a roof...
North is not pretty, but no one sees it because the neighbor is directly opposite at a 6m distance.

The offset alignment from the entrance to the door or an open corner is "not nice".
Why not swap the living room and kitchen and move the entrance to the open-plan room elsewhere? For example, the wardrobe could be placed opposite the stairs.
However, I say: in this cost-saving mode, the stairs are not suitable for adding an access to the utility room there. Additionally, the space under the stairs is needed to create a storage room.
Why is the utility room "back there"? Aren't there long distances for the supply lines?
This can only be answered in the overall context of the property, garage or carport, and street connection, so please post the site plan with the house marked,
What do you think?

The offset alignment bothers us too; the only idea we had was to place the wardrobe on the wall of the guest bathroom. However, that would make the wardrobe significantly smaller. So far, we haven’t found a good alternative, since the utility room is perfectly located there.
We found the kitchen on the east side with the terrace door for stepping outside quite nice for having coffee on the planned garden bench on the east side. The east side has a very special charm for us because there is a wooded dune here completely without development. That invites lingering and having coffee in the morning at sunrise.

North is not beautiful, ...

...and neither is the West nor the East.

...and neither the west nor the east.

Yeah, very funny. The east side is a real challenge, a lot of window area is desired. Only the patio door in the kitchen is fixed here. If you can offer alternatives that provide a more harmonious exterior appearance on the east facade, bring them on. We are completely open here. We only wish for a floor-to-ceiling window in the children's room on the east side. The same applies to the west side.

[QUOTE="bafische, post: 328732, member: 47959"

One request, if I may:
The arrangement of the house on the plot should not be the subject of this discussion; this is solely about the floor plan given the location and orientation of the house. Everything inside can still be changed. The circumstances are so varied that an explanation would go beyond the scope here.
[/QUOTE]

The site plan and also the development or possible development of neighboring plots significantly influence the possibilities and also the necessities of one's own development and thus also the floor plan.

What do you want to achieve with your question?

Olli

The site plan and also the development or possible development of the neighboring properties significantly influence the possibilities and also necessities of one's own development and thus also the floor plan. What do you want to achieve with your question?

From my point of view, the OP has stated this clearly:

This is only about the floor plan given the location and orientation of the house. Everything inside can still be changed.

a) this is what he wants: our input on this floor plan.

A request, please: The arrangement of the house on the plot should not become the subject of this discussion, [...] The circumstances are so manifold that an explanation here would go beyond the scope.

b) this is what he does not want: to reopen the placement of the house in the building window. If I remember correctly, this aspect was already examined and questioned extensively in the previous thread linked by me of the OP; thus, it seems to me a legitimate wish not to expand this thread into a "reopening procedure," but to use the site plan purely as background information and on this basis only discuss the "internal" spatial arrangement. The further remark "if the word 'if' did not exist, the house would stand even better otherwise" objectively has its justification but was already formally considered "in the previous instance" and may well be regarded by the OP as "exhausted." So let us limit ourselves to the desired floor plan critique. Mine will then also be correspondingly brief: generally speaking, I find the design okay; personally, the building mass has a bit too much symmetry for my taste.