100m² Small House Floor Plan - Too Small?

  • Erstellt am 2021-04-30 23:46:09

Wandervogel85

2021-05-03 07:22:58
  • #1


In southern BaWü, on the edge of the Black Forest. Although "increased" has to be seen in a relative way. At the eaves, 80 cm and at the gable 70 cm are required. So only a little more than is often built today.

I could imagine that the whole thing will be similar to the Town & Country Raumwunder in the southern variant. There, I think, 1 m is executed all around, including an elevated knee wall and a slightly reduced roof pitch. So it looks like a house from the Allgäu.
 

Harakiri

2021-05-04 14:06:16
  • #2


Changing the ceiling height is, of course, just a luxury point – although if you place value on the resale option of the property, it could be an argument. Also worth considering – if you stick with the idea of Danwood & the Point – leaving the roof open to the ridge on the upper floor, with visible roof beams. That's also luxury, but I find it a significant improvement of the spatial impression – the net cost difference should be around 3 to 5k €.

Out of all three options, I would first adjust the knee wall (we increased ours to 150 cm) – in terms of price/performance ratio, this offers the most benefit (upstairs). And I'm fairly sure that this also opens up some options in the bathroom for you to accommodate your desired larger shower without having to build over the stairs. For example, if you can shift the bathtub another 20-30 cm towards the outer wall (which should be quite possible since the installation doesn't require the thick casing), you could also shift the bathroom window towards the north and possibly execute it as a dormer or slanted window and use the gained space at the bottom of the plan for the shower. Such a window style may fit very well into your region.

Also consider a double casement window or stairwell window – otherwise, it tends to be rather dark there. Additional costs for a double casement window (triple glazed with electric shutters) are about 2.2k €.



If you want to bring EL yourself, the Family series is of course a very good option – especially since the Family 104 has a very similar floor plan. However, you have probably read the “rules” of the Family program: no changes to statically relevant components (e.g., your idea of building over the stairs generally wouldn't be allowed), window positions cannot be changed (only height and type of opening), and the selection of bathroom fixtures & tiles is strictly limited (you can also remove them entirely, although the credits then do not at all compensate for a sanitary installation by a German company). However, you can mirror the floor plan.

It is obviously much cheaper – even if you calculate the EL out in the Today series, the price difference is still at least 5k € and up to 10k € depending on the final configuration. Some options are significantly cheaper in the Family series (e.g., increasing the knee wall to 1.5 m costs only 1.5k €, but is only possible if the roof pitch is adjusted). Air-to-water heat pump or ground-source heat pump technology, KfW40, etc. are also possible in the Family series.

Depending on the sales department and their relationship with Danwood, you can occasionally have something changed outside the “rules” as a special request – for example, the roof overhang should be possible in your case since it is prescribed. Otherwise, to my knowledge, it would not be allowed in Family.
 

Nemesis

2021-05-04 14:44:26
  • #3
Then your nickname here is a deceitful deception ;)
 

11ant

2021-05-04 15:53:14
  • #4
Two warnings should be considered by fans of increasing the knee wall: secondly, raising the knee wall also raises the "equator" or the dividing line between facade and roof windows, and firstly, it regularly leads to the risk of creating a full storey. A Flair 113 with its standard knee wall is already borderline, and this applies accordingly to all direct competing models. With a 150 cm knee wall, at least in the two-thirds of the federal states, it almost always entails a requirement to enlarge the ground floor.
 

Wandervogel85

2021-05-04 17:29:16
  • #5


Thanks for the detailed answer.
I have my first consultation with Danwood on Thursday. I will raise all these points then as well.
I have also already seen the Family series, that is definitely an option. Maybe the Family 119 then.

It’s clear that not everything can be done at once. I also cannot raise the room height on the ground floor at the same time as raising the knee wall. Then I will probably exceed the maximum ridge height allowed by the development plan. And among all considerations, raising the knee wall would definitely be the more important priority.
 

Harakiri

2021-05-04 17:55:52
  • #6
We ultimately took the Family 119, so: if you ever want to go in that direction, feel free to ask - although I was only able to fit a 100x90 shower in it. ;) You (I think) didn’t write what max. eaves height you have, but for example with the F119 (standard room height), 1.5 m knee wall, KfW40 insulation package and 30-degree roof pitch, you’re at about 4.7 m eaves height and just over 7 m ridge height.
 

Similar topics
15.07.2014Foundation slab for Danwood bungalow? Company for complete works?11
09.06.2016Optimizing the floor plan of a 150 m² house - Tips42
11.03.2018Optimization of Angle Bungalow 108 by Town & Country21
25.04.2018Kniestock Danwood House in Schleswig-Holstein - What is the maximum possible?23
02.09.2019L-shaped bungalow with 120 sqm - layout etc.?74
05.11.2020Floor plan single-family house - Your assessment20
15.05.2021Town & Country Raumwunder 100 with few changes20
01.11.2024Danwood complete offer vs. separate commissioning architect13
22.08.2025Danwood Family - Project realistic?33

Oben