Is that a requirement according to the development plan?
The catalog house is the Point 109, do you also want to build with Danwood? Do you know the prices, not the catalog prices, but the bottom line?
Do you want to multiply or do you want to live alone forever? Base your house on that just like your lifestyle habits. If you are a solitary garden person, I would rather build a Perfect with an attic. If you can speculate that something will still happen there, I would wait with the house construction anyway. If you exclude nothing but want to plan initially without expectations just for yourself, I would also rather build a Perfect with an expandable attic.
Your variant on the ground floor has eliminated the wardrobe. Is that such a good choice?
A technical room is nowadays not a dirty room. Where will you do the laundry? Right: in the cleaning room ;) So it will be as clean as you keep it.
The rooms would be too small for me, yes.
I used to have 86 sqm alone with 2 large rooms. No garbage rooms at all... I would say: the 11 are with a sloping roof. So you can use somewhat less sqm. None can really serve well as a sports room, except mattress sports, like floor-level yoga or something ;)
What do you intend with the rooms? Storage and office?
Officially, that then does not count as a parking space. None may be blocked.
No, there is no requirement regarding the ridge direction in the development plan. But since the plot is almost perfectly aligned north-south, that almost inevitably results. And as it is drawn now, I find the orientation of the rooms not bad. Sleeping in the northeast. Living room in the northeast, with a window on the south side. Office towards the street, possibly a children's room in the garden.
In the north and east, the adjacent gardens are huge in size, so I am not boxed in. On the other side of the street, by the way, there is a noise protection embankment for a rarely used football field (one evening a week). So no one will box me in there either.
I also thought about the wardrobe thing. But I find the door to the technical room better placed in the hallway. Also, I can then add a bit more countertop space in the kitchen where the door to the technical room was before.
And before it is suggested, I like the direct access from the hallway to the kitchen. I don’t want to carry all groceries first through the living-dining room. Nor do I want to have to go through the kitchen to get to the living room. I wouldn’t change that.
The room usage should actually be pretty logical with so few rooms:
1x bathroom
1x bedroom
1x office, which could then be converted into a children’s room, hence the enlargement compared to the standard floor plan.
1x storage room, which would become the office in case of a children’s room.
I can’t imagine for the life of me why anyone would need a dedicated sports room. You do sports outside, and the home trainer can also stand in the office if necessary (or serve as a replacement for the famous "chair" in the bedroom). Likewise, I can’t imagine why one would need a separate dressing room. That is probably just a matter of taste.
If the space in front of the carport does not count as a second parking space, it is even more important to know which living space is considered for the parking space statute. According to DIN277, I would need about 110 sqm; according to the Living Space Ordinance, it has to be 99.x sqm.
Where?
... skip the door, you don’t need it in that small section alone. Close the opening with drywall, if desired, or a snappy room divider ...
In principle, I find the house poorly positioned. I would pay more attention to the evening sun.
Sure, you don’t need a door there. But it would be important to me.
How would you position the house?
I think the gable facing the street is quite good. That makes the house look normal size and not so tiny. The house is also quite standard in width, just a bit short.
I understand the evening sun thing, but I also don’t want the terrace in front of the house and sit by the street.