What kind of enclosure is allowed? Is a bamboo hedge also permitted?

Regarding Yvonne: I don’t understand these derogatory taste judgments about the cheap cemetery thuja trees that everyone would take. You don’t like them, so you wouldn’t take them yourself, so not everyone!, but if Hansens like them: it’s their land. What a taste dictatorship.

I did not establish this rule. I am just glad that my neighbor doesn’t impose something like that on me.

I am also glad that two-thirds of everything here must be white-plastered.

I deliberately built here because according to the regulations it must become a great settlement and it did.

Those who cannot come to terms with the regulations simply don’t build here. That’s okay. It’s a leasehold anyway – they can gladly dismiss the whole area here for themselves, a) because of the regulations and b) because of the leasehold (who wants something like that?)

Only in a world where building land is scarce and many take anything as long as they have something at all, are such ideas as "You don't have to build here" theory and these taste regulations in my opinion abuse of power. Karsten

Only in a world where building land is scarce and many people take whatever they can get, as long as they have something at all, are ideas like "You don't have to build here" just theory and these taste regulations in my opinion abuse of power. Karsten

We still have enough plots here (in general). Many did not want these plots because they are leasehold. Karsten, where there's a will, there's a way. If it were the case here that you have to take whatever you can still get, then such design rules would be completely irrelevant. Then you would be glad to get anything at all.

As long as people complain about it, the market cannot be that bad. These birds can keep searching.

This has nothing to do with abuse of power if it results in a village (mind you, a village!) with a new development area that is deliberately designed so that it stands out from the village center through its design, gaining (we all don't want a dead village center). There are enough other sins here in the district that prove some prior thought about the development plan topic is quite good. I do not necessarily mean exclusion of building or eaves heights (or so), but a tiering of building areas or zoning might be quite cleverly arranged.

Sorry for the off-topic

I see it the same way. As if the raging mob were standing on the street shouting "Single-family homes, NOW!". People are getting nervous because of low interest rates and see a chance that might pass. Could that be the reason to simply allow everything everywhere, to put it bluntly? Then you look back 5-10 years later and ask yourself what you were thinking.

That also has nothing to do with abuse of power. Rules have always existed and budgets have always been limited. Take it or leave it has not only applied since 2008ff.

Is there an annex in the development plan that regulates what is native and what is not? Otherwise, this is a very vague formulation IMHO, which provides a wonderful breeding ground for misunderstandings and disputes.

Could be, I haven't seen/received one yet. We're just starting to develop...

Sorry for the off topic

No problem, I like reading off topic.

By the way, I also have no problem with native trees and shrubs, I thought the idea of planting bamboo around the terrace was very good, so that's how I'll do it.

Should one actually have a fence with a gate on the street side? Or is it not weird to live so "open" without one?

We have the restriction: no needle conifers. I'm glad because otherwise everyone would put the cheap cemetery thuja hedges on the border here.

Here I am. I like the cemetery thujas and they look good. But I am really amazed at all the regulations there are for one's own property. Two fruit trees, native plants... oh dear.