What can we finance?

  • Erstellt am 2019-01-21 21:24:04

Zaba12

2019-01-24 09:14:45
  • #1
You underestimate the scale of the construction sum here. With that equity, one should not amortize at 2%. And with more than 80% loan-to-value, the interest rates are not great either. If the rent were around 2,000€, the comments would also be different. In this situation, everything speaks in favor of buying land without immediate construction measures. And just because the bank says financing is not a problem does not mean that everything is optimal. The risk is always borne by the borrower. Not the evil bank.
 

chand1986

2019-01-24 09:22:25
  • #2

However, a purely economic consideration is not about breaking even here.

Just as a counterexample: How many apartments for renting could one have purchased with the equity, and where would the personal wealth be after the repayment phase compared to the situation where one has paid off their own home? Exactly!

Economically, the equity return in owner-occupied homes is in most cases amazingly poor.


All good and valid arguments in favor of owner-occupied property.


If you had borne the same savings rate (= repayment) anyway, I disagree. If forced savings through the loan contract have psychological advantages, it looks different again.
 

chand1986

2019-01-24 09:25:32
  • #3
I can only reaffirm that. The land is, in the worst case, value-stable, but it is more likely that it will appreciate over time. This increases the equity until construction. In addition, when buying land and building a house as clearly separate projects in time, one saves taxes, if I am not mistaken? At these amounts, that would be more than just peanuts.
 

Yosan

2019-01-24 09:43:03
  • #4

You mean the real estate transfer tax, right?
Isn't it the case that even if you build immediately, only the land is taken as the basis, as long as you don't buy the land from the builder (developer) who also builds the house? So basically, as long as there are two clearly separate purchases (even if they are close in time), only the land counts as the basis for calculation?!
 

CrazyChris

2019-01-24 09:50:56
  • #5


That's correct
 

Altai

2019-01-24 12:56:56
  • #6


I was referring to the rent of a four-room apartment that was mentioned (which would apparently be needed if the family grows), not to the current apartment – which is of course unbeatable in terms of price.

So I don’t want to advocate a rushed purchase here, I wrote earlier that no one can take away the risk assessment. That enormous sums also have to flow into the repayment is clear. This is a huge project.

I also think the idea of acquiring the land now and waiting a little longer to build is good. How much does the land itself cost?
 

Similar topics
04.11.2009Taking a loan for equity financing?19
20.07.2011House construction: Equity / incidental construction costs realistic?14
30.04.2012No equity, good income, financing feasible?22
20.05.2013Question: 1% repayment and 10 years fixed interest rate. Will the house never be paid off?13
24.05.2013Build big? Or continue renting?23
20.06.2013Problems with equity - real estate purchase15
17.06.2014House purchase planned at the beginning of 2015 - No equity41
21.08.2014Is financing without equity realistic?19
05.10.2014Building a house without equity26
27.10.2014Fixed interest rate financing without equity?20
18.03.2015Buying property feasible - Loan with building savings as equity?12
12.09.2015Repayment or Repayment + Home Savings Plan10
15.09.2016Financing without equity with security?52
19.01.2016Is a home construction project realistic?22
25.05.2016Financing without equity - Repayment / Interest63
31.10.2016Is a home ownership project sensible as a single?21
10.05.2019Subcontract before purchasing the property?30
31.12.2020Land purchase with varied financing - is it sensible to hold back equity?10
01.07.2021Financing / Equity / Granny Flat - Fundamental Thoughts48
16.05.2023Consumer credit for land purchase?19

Oben