We are building our own nest - the way & report into the house

  • Erstellt am 2019-08-24 10:06:55

kaho674

2019-08-28 10:00:49
  • #1
Please read the first two threads from this link:
https://www.hausbau-forum.de/forums/Baukosten-Förderungen.180/

It is best to take several lists and compare them with yours. Write down what is added on your side, cross out what is removed, etc. Afterwards, write offers and prices for each item and then total the sum at the bottom.
 

philipp1990

2019-08-28 16:36:34
  • #2
Thank you very much! The list will be created and then published
 

philipp1990

2019-08-28 17:30:47
  • #3
I have one more question. In our case, if everything fits, land acquisition + house construction would be separate but we would pay for both from one pot. The land transfer tax would still only apply to the land and not to house and land, right?
 

Escroda

2019-08-28 22:32:10
  • #4
This is not because the municipalities and offices are slow, but because these systems do not show planning law. While the cadastre indicates the actual use at the time of the last survey, BORIS is based on statistical model analyses of purchase price collection data, which is why there are inaccuracies, especially in the peripheral areas. What both applications have in common is a look into the past and not into the future, as a land use plan does, for example, which apparently does not exist for your municipal area. But even the land use plan makes no binding statements about buildability, but at least shows a tendency. That would be something. But there is only one for another village in your municipality, at least online. Sounds quite unbelievable, as statutes cannot set property boundaries. Nevertheless, I am quite confident that you are allowed to build there, since on the opposite side of the street there are still two houses further out toward the village.
 

philipp1990

2019-08-29 18:00:54
  • #5
I have the statute here. I will summarize once:

For the area XYZ

1. Permissibility of projects: Projects on properties within the spatial scope of this statute for the area XYZ are considered part of the inner area, therefore belonging to the contiguous built-up district of the locality XYZ and are treated according to §34 paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Building Code. Projects are only permissible if the specifications on the site plan are observed, they fit into the character of the immediate surroundings, and the development is secured.

2. Spatial scope
3. Entry into force

Reasoning:

The municipality can no longer offer building plots for builders. Therefore, the municipality decided to develop this supplementary statute, which was already proposed in the local development concept.

With the legal effect of the statute, building rights would be created for approximately 5 - 6 residential buildings. On the opposite side of the street there are also residential plots with residential buildings that form the urban framework.

The affected area is currently farmland and is located directly on the street. Structural facilities are only present underground in the form of a drinking water pipeline. On the street side, the area is therefore well and sufficiently developed. Media-side development is in the immediate vicinity and must be partially supplemented.

Definition of scope - southern boundary street - western boundary defined so that the building boundary to the west aligns with the opposite residential building and the required edge greening is easily possible. Thus, a nose formation in the outer area is prevented. To the north, the statute borders the boundary of the adjacent agricultural land parcel.

The building boundary was set back 10 m from the parcel boundary of the street and thus approx. 17 m from the street centerline. The distance was chosen to minimize emissions from the street.

According to statements from the lower water authority and the regional government office, the statute area is outside of drinking water protection zones and designated flood zones.

Before starting development work, it should be checked whether there are drains within the scope. If this is the case, suitable measures must be taken to preserve functionality.

Regarding development, it says here:

Street

The street runs on the street side in front of the scope and thus develops the planned area. The sidewalk is built over a part of the statute area as shown in the site plan. It would need to be extended as required.

Drinking water

The drinking water supply is secured. The municipality itself is the network operator. The water pipeline runs parallel to the street directly over the parcels of the statute area. Connection of the properties is possible.

Wastewater

A separation system exists in the street, to which the statute area is to be connected. Since infiltration will be difficult due to the low soil distance to the groundwater, rainwater can also be channeled into the pipe system. The connection of the locality to the central sewage treatment plant is planned for 2007.

Electricity

Overhead power lines are on the opposite side of the street, which can secure development. Specific network measures for the supplier only arise after the capacity registration by the connection user or the construction charges bearer. For planning and construction of a supply connection, an official supply application must be submitted, on the basis of which a cost estimate will be prepared. Before construction begins, capacity status plans must be obtained.

Natural gas

Not available.

Telecommunications

Supply installations of Deutsche Telekom are located in the street and sidewalk area in front of the statute area. For the telecommunications supply of the residential buildings, installation of new telecommunications lines is required. The start of construction should be notified to Telekom at least 3 months in advance. Regardless, the builders must also submit an application for the provision of telecommunications facilities.

Open points / questions unclear points:

1. Neighbor has a bungalow, so a bungalow should not be a problem?
2. Boundaries – would be as assumed – northern line from neighbor?
3. Regarding the drains who would bear the costs of the measures?
4. Street development – currently there is no sidewalk, if it is extended as needed, at whose cost?

That’s it, is there anything else I should consider / check?

Thank you to everyone who has read this far!
 

Escroda

2019-08-29 18:55:46
  • #6
Correct. That is advisable. However, the statute does not prescribe property boundaries, but building boundaries, namely 17m from the middle of the street. Although it would certainly be helpful if you did not withhold the site plan from the forum. The one who restricts the functionality. Ask the municipality, ask the neighbor; in case of doubt, you. If you find two more supporters, the cost could be split three ways.
 

Similar topics
07.10.2014Renounce Telekom connection30
01.01.2016Cost of house connection for Kabel Deutschland and Telekom?37
30.05.2016Apply for Telekom / Unity Media connection in parallel11
16.07.2016Telekom connection - line already laid, still have to pay 600€?29
08.08.2016Connection costs for telecom, cable, electricity10
01.02.2017Duration of completion notification for Telekom house connection22
05.02.2017Land costs? What is included?13
14.01.2018Kabel Deutschland or Telekom or both14
10.01.2018Telekom says TV is not possible - Can that really be true?29
20.02.2018Telekom home connection, your experiences. Is Magenta M okay?43
06.11.2018House connection: Telekom does not want to drill through the white tank17
05.12.2018Dispute between telecom and municipal utilities - house connection10
11.04.2021Plan a conduit for Telekom?21
12.11.2020Internet connection: Deutsche Telekom vs. cable network33
30.03.2020Telekom FTTH - What is needed?30
03.01.2021Problems with Telekom. Crossed cable?33
19.02.2021Telekom Hybrid or Vodafone Cable - Advantages & Disadvantages for Internet36
04.01.2022Cable vs. Telecom Fiber Optic - Decision56
02.12.2022Creation of the house connection by Telekom15
11.03.2023Fiber optic expansion by 1&1 or Telekom - Who pays for the construction trenches?20

Oben