11ant
2025-07-13 21:56:01
- #1
I wouldn't do alpine style just for the house to architecturally yodel: regional building styles have their (including climatic) reasons, without the corresponding high-altitude sun you can quickly curse the wide roof overhangs. I don't see plaster on the bottom and wood cladding on top as a reasonable reason for a mixed construction method, but a hillside location I do see as a recommendation for a stone construction (which does not make it harder to create a wooden construction appearance). Disqualifying a provider because they only use single boarding as standard seems nonsense to me. This belongs to the detailed planning "sampled," for example, boarding kitchen walls differently. Essential for the "load-bearing capacity" of the wall is the second to top wall layer. Here, a wood-based material brings more than an additional or thicker drywall panel. I would always take a freelance architect for a hillside location. The general contractor plan template authorized ones literally offer the "necessary" architectural services. In the fee league of discount architects, having their services itemized separately does not change that.
That is, however, relevant and should lead to the selection of all move-in ready providers if the finish standard "weather-tight shell construction" is sought.
I am not interested in any heating, flooring, tiles, or anything else, as I am doing all of that myself.
That is, however, relevant and should lead to the selection of all move-in ready providers if the finish standard "weather-tight shell construction" is sought.