Flo&Steffi
2025-07-14 10:00:31
- #1
Once again. Yes, everyone will offer you something from the usual standard home builders. But with your wishes, that is the most expensive option you can choose. And depending on the experience of the home builder, it is not the option that is regularly built and is therefore prone to errors.
It will be more individual (including any desired wall construction for your 30kg pictures) and cheaper with a house planned for the slope by an architect. Then you can gladly build with the local carpentry or similar, who will only credit you €3,000 for leaving out the heating or similar, but not the actually calculated €10,000 (including profit), and instead present a shell construction for your own work.
Aside from that, timber frame construction on a slope is also not an easy undertaking. It has many disadvantages compared to the solid construction (at least for the basement on the slope).
Thank you.
Could you briefly elaborate on the topic "has disadvantages on the slope," if you like? I am absolutely not aware why this is the case, and I would be very grateful for advice. Because currently, I assume technically: "It doesn’t matter at all, because the massive concrete basement is on the slope, and whatever is built on top of it doesn’t matter." If this is not the case, then that is a huge point that none of the locals told me, as I have certainly asked. A mason, a carpenter. A brief note on the heating: Everyone has completely credited the heating technology. Only Schwörerhaus leaves a difference for a point "extended installation method" open, but that is only about €2,500 difference to the full heat pump, which is okay for me. You always have to see it as a big whole, which then comes out in the final apple-to-apple comparison.