Bauherrin123
2025-07-19 21:08:22
- #1
Let's start with the fence on the boundary. Your neighbor can demand this as a usual enclosure, and you have to contribute 50% of the costs. If you do not agree on a fence, you only have to pay the costs (50%) of the local customary enclosure.
Besides that, there is another fence behind the shared enclosure. That is also possible, but you should keep some distance from the fence on the boundary. Furthermore, the fence must not harass the neighbor or constitute an "unreasonable impairment". So a 2-meter high concrete wall as a fence you would probably have to tear down again on demand. A normal fence (double wire mesh or similar) at e.g. 50 cm distance up to 2 meters in height is allowed.
Limitation: Check the development plan, there can be regulations deviating from the neighbor law.
Thank you very much again for the detailed explanation. What would be a usual enclosure? Would a chain-link fence also be acceptable here? Because even if I only had to contribute 50%, I don’t want to have to spend thousands of euros for it. The neighbor wants a double wire mesh fence at 120 cm, I don’t necessarily, I am not sure yet what I want. But I am attaching a picture of the direction it should go. And yes, 180 cm is completely sufficient for me. As I said, it is not my intention to annoy the neighbor, I want privacy at a reasonable height. Since the street is in front of us, and to the left the neighbor’s property is undeveloped, we will do 180 cm there, and also 180 cm for the small section to neighbor Müller. I think it’s 7 meters.
By the way, I have the answer from the building authority, I am attaching it below. So if I put up fences, do I have to plant around them or how do you understand that?
By the way, the lady from city planning knows our Mr. Müller, he once had a confrontation there because he is not allowed to build on a parking space that he was sold by the developer as a parking lot. He made a big fuss, which is partly understandable, he got 7000 euros back for it and is allowed to keep it as a meadow. Otherwise, he has too little green space if he builds on it due to the subdivision of the plots. Nevertheless, he built against the building permit. That means, up to now I have always avoided waking sleeping dogs, but if it doesn’t work otherwise, I will also ask city planning for advice, because at this point I don’t care if it gets checked here and his illegal construction comes to light. Since it doesn’t concern me, I am not bothered by his construction, on the contrary, thanks to his illegal parking space, he has enough places for his cars, otherwise the good man used to park on MY property and I had no parking space for myself.