Support hanging and filling - Additional costs?

  • Erstellt am 2020-05-26 22:01:01

Escroda

2020-05-29 14:53:47
  • #1
You don't like my site plan? That's a pity. Your circling only allows for assumptions. I suspect border development, and that would not be permitted with a roof terrace, as the green area is supposed to become a private green space according to the development plan.
 

Thirteen

2020-05-30 13:48:07
  • #2


Your site plan is our alternative.
On the right side of the house (viewed from the street) I think is the lowest point, so the garage would be suitable there. On the other side then the entrance.

Let's see what ideas the planners will still have. Garages, terraces and similar things are also allowed to be built up to the property boundary here.
 

Escroda

2020-05-30 14:19:35
  • #3

I meant that you enter your project into the empty plan so that everyone can see exactly what you mean.

No. That’s why I entered the elevation points. The lowest point is in the north. Also why I placed the garage in the northwest.

Terraces not, especially not on garages.
 

Thirteen

2020-05-30 18:37:35
  • #4
Here is our plan for how the garage and the house should be situated.
And also an excerpt from our development plan. I had actually understood it as meaning that terraces and garages do not necessarily have to be within the building envelope. However, I am happy to be proven wrong.
If we place the garage in front of the house, we have the problem that it blocks light from the basement. That is why we would prefer to arrange it on the side (see picture) and place the main entrance on the other side, so that the terrace and such are located in the southwest.

 

Escroda

2020-05-30 19:27:41
  • #5
Thank you, that is helpful. According to this, the garage should not be on the boundary and everything is fine. However, your drawn house is only 7.8m*9m and the garage is only 3m*4.5m in size. This is correct from a planning law perspective. Also from a building code perspective, but not if the terrace is on top of the garage. Then it triggers setback requirements. And under private law, a ground-level terrace must also maintain a minimum distance of 2.5m from the boundary according to Hessian neighbor law. Well, since the neighboring property is a private green area, the neighbor’s consent should not actually be withheld here.
 

Thirteen

2020-05-30 20:01:36
  • #6
You are right. I did not draw the house and the garage exactly because we do not yet know how big the house will ultimately be. But I assume that the garage will no longer fit within the building area. However, if I understood you correctly, that is not a problem as long as it is at least 2.5m away from the property boundary, right?
 

Similar topics
17.12.2015Wall on property boundary45
11.07.2016Question about site plan - is a 3m distance mandatory?12
12.11.2016Rooftop terrace on garages10
24.03.2017Location of the garage on the property11
14.10.2024Meaning of spatially effective garages13
16.06.2017Living in workshop / garages21
27.01.2018Property boundary - Building close to it - Permission?11
04.07.2018Distance from property boundary with a lower neighboring plot14
18.10.2018Construction costs for terraces, etc. in cost estimation according to DIN 2719
19.01.2019Garages in NRW permit-free from 2019?12
28.03.2019Unclear property boundary and legal consequences12
31.10.2019Single-family house 180-190 sqm on a 10x20m building plot, first draft general contractor78
22.02.2021Distance from terrace to property boundary55
18.03.2021How strictly must developers adhere to the site plan?10
09.05.2021Placement of house, terrace, carport & co. in the building window40
05.01.2022Terraces: How many and where?18
03.12.2023Who has to restore the height of the garages/parking space?50
09.09.2024Building on family-owned property - green space with ground monument37
03.02.2025Building window and boundary construction new development area22
08.05.2025Cost of installing garages with crane20

Oben