I have now looked at 3 properties and all three are actually good, although we would probably have good chances with two of them; the third one will likely have quite a bit of competition, but from my point of view, that is also the most interesting property.
A semi-detached house, built in 1978, but continuously renovated and modernized (windows, roof insulation, photovoltaics, solar collectors for hot water). Great plot (400 sqm) with a beautiful garden and a granny flat (actually my dream, but the family is not so happy with the location). The heating will surely need to be replaced at some point (25 years old). The carpets on the upper floor would still need to be replaced. However, the price is pretty much at the upper end of our budget. Maybe some negotiation is possible. I think I would have to calculate another 15k here for removing the carpet and installing parquet. Then it should be okay. Both bathrooms still have the original tiles... which is very much a matter of taste, but everything works.
A semi-detached house from 1991, great plot, but on a slope with a little stream, and with a small separate granny flat. The house itself mainly needs new floors and walls. Otherwise, a new heating system is required. A new heating system with 15% renewable energy is mandatory when changing owners and if the heating is over 30 years old. This house is the cheapest price-wise, but with renovation, I think surely 30-50k (depending on whether the heating is included) will bring it to a similar level, maybe 20-30k cheaper.
A mid-terrace house, built in 1995, this is the family favorite, but the garden is quite small (about 50 sqm). The living area is huge (185 sqm). The energy consumption is below 50 (Class A), energy certificate. How they managed that, I don’t know, or it might just be extremely well insulated for that time.
I have a few questions about this house because it is probably the one that is most suitable and where we probably have realistic chances. I don’t know whether I should start a separate thread for this, but I’ll put the questions here anyway.
Since the house has been rented out since the beginning (to the same tenants the whole time), it is in good condition, but of course not much has been invested (compared to the 1978 house above). What we definitely need to do is repaint everything, possibly also replace some wallpaper in certain places. The tenant has poorly filled some holes in the wall (see photo) and also a few tiles are cracked as they have probably settled. Generally, the tiled floor on the ground floor seems somewhat uneven to me. We would therefore like to lay parquet on the ground floor and replace all the carpets upstairs with either parquet or vinyl (which is better?). The carpets can be removed relatively easily (the pile), but a foam/adhesive layer remains on the screed. Can parquet or vinyl be laid over this, or would it have to be removed?
Regarding the tiles on the ground floor, parquet can probably be laid over them; I had looked into this before in another context. But I don’t know if that generally applies.
The attic is open at the top; we are considering whether to divide it or close off the room with walls. That will depend on how a door can be installed because of the sloping roof. Around the stairwell, wooden stud walls could probably be built somehow.
Another point is the windows (see photo). While the lower part has a roller shutter, the upper part does not (at least I have not seen one). So the question for me is what solutions there are here.
Many thanks in advance and best regards,
Hubi
