Preliminary insolvency of the developer - What to do?

But I would like to know how the 10% come about

As mentioned. The planning is actually only worth about 5%; and not even complete yet.

There are definitely still missing the execution plans of individual trades, construction management, acceptance, checking the invoices of the craftsmen, tendering.

Then there are also expert costs (after all, someone has to estimate the services provided) so that you can throw your lot (or claim) into the insolvency proceedings, as well as attorney fees...

In addition, anyone who continues this will basically have themselves paid for the "familiarization" (either transparently at the beginning, or later on). They do not just accept a half-finished plan blindly.

What is still left open is who will actually take over further planning or play the architect, or also be responsible for what has been created so far (i.e., whether statics etc. are really okay). Because you can hardly hold the insolvent party liable in case of emergency.

Normally, your almost insolvent general contractor, who would do this and only passes on the construction work to a subcontractor who is familiar with shell construction. And these are rather "guys" from construction; less planners/architects.

You don’t want to jump from one thing to another.

Friends of refined construction talk, don’t get him wild now. Whether misery, half misery, black eye, or good luck, it will be revealed. I hope the latter. Karsten

The payment plan is really strange, but now it's too late (the payment plan overall looks really adventurous). In the end, the only option left is to go to a specialist lawyer and definitely not to transfer any more money to the old company. The money that has already been transferred is, of course, gone. A company does not file for insolvency because it still has money to give back to you. The only thing that would still be possible is if the work for the 15% is also completed (or was completed, as is theoretically intended with these invoices).

the only thing that would still be possible is if the work for the 15% is also completed (or was completed, as is theoretically intended with these invoices).

The problem is that the general contractor has no work to do for the 15%. That is only planning, and without detailed planning at that. The remaining payment schedule is borderline criminal. Accordingly, payments before roofing are:

- 15% of an assumed 350k house price = 52.5k
- 70% of an assumed 400k final price after selection, minus 52.5k = 243.25k
- so a total of 74% for an unfinished shell

You can see that the general contractor urgently needed money.

P - the 15% of assumed 350k house price = 52.5k - the 70% of assumed 400k final price after sampling minus 52.5k = 243.25k - so a total of 74% for an unfinished shell

That is not correct at all and it is not stated like that in my uploaded excerpts. 15% of the house sum for all work up to the start of house construction 10% of the remaining sum for the foundation slab 10% of the remaining sum for the basement 50% of the remaining sum for the shell without roof It may be that you mean unfinished by the 75% that the roof is still missing but what I don't have, I also don't have to pay for and whether the remaining sum still open would be sufficient for a roof or interior fittings, I cannot judge

It may be that by unfinished you mean that at 75% the roof is still missing, but what I don’t have, I also don’t have to pay for

That’s exactly how it is. You would have paid 75% and only have a shell without roofing.

Fair for everyone would be 40% for the shell completed; or 48/50% after roofing