Parkett joints installed untidily? Defect or tolerance?

On the other hand, it is absolutely equivalent to having branded goods processed by someone inexperienced. In my opinion, the goods have visibly suffered; the edges look battered, like "stonewashed." Sanding, which would ultimately have to be done to a scratch-depth, almost amounts to "surface milling," and the result triggers a horror movie in my mind when I imagine it being done again by the same foolish hands. To what extent "first-instance" rectifications would have to be accepted here, I cannot judge from a consumer rights perspective, but I do not expect a satisfactory result.

I would wish for a precedent-setting judgment against the processing of high-quality goods by unskilled or semi-skilled workers, because it is becoming an epidemic: cases of branded clinker bricks laid by semi-skilled stone setters and grouted by "screed-Achmeds" (thanks to for this wonderful term) are something we get to admire quite regularly here; currently, this week another thread deals with windows from a brand manufacturer that were improperly assembled and "installed" – which also seems to be in fashion.

Misusing a branded product in its construction service description to give the appearance of a quality level and then bungling it during processing (we remember from math class: a product is bad even if only one of its factors is bad) must finally be freed from the aura of being a minor offense!

Only... if underfloor heating is installed, the parquet is probably glued with flexible adhesive. And you can hardly get it out again.

Why is this so hard to remove? It's just chewing gum stuff, the parquet adhesive.