Coletrickle_7808
2020-05-06 13:40:32
- #1
Exactly, plan from #26.
It's not my dressing table.
It's not my dressing table.
Adblocker erkannt
The Gussek House Brooklyn measures 10.60 x 8.80 m and should be feasible for your size. By the way, I do not see any of the mentioned models as a "build the 1.1 exactly" suggestion, but rather as an encouragement to change your thinking direction and as an example.Would this floor plan be roughly feasible, unfortunately there are no size specifications here.
You will never ever build Brooklyn. You will - precisely because you stubbornly want to turn it into Queens - end up at Bronx. This is not a contradiction, this is a causal connection. I'll just say Ilsebill Fischer.Ah yes, we are almost building Brooklyn (sometime soon)
The Gussek House Brooklyn measures 10.60 x 8.80 m and should be feasible for your size. By the way, I don’t see any of the mentioned models as a "build the 1.1 exactly" suggestion, but as an inspiration for a change of thinking and an example. You never ever build Brooklyn. You will end up in Bronx – precisely because you stubbornly want to make Queens out of it. That is not a contradiction, that is a causal connection. I’m just saying Ilsebill Fischer
Several alternative models were mentioned by name, but from my point of view only as suggestions, freely to be interpreted, and not specifically to fit your exterior dimensions. Rather, simply to show how other manufacturers implement different staircases and floor plan layouts for a similar house volume and this family size. Your problem was that a requested staircase change ruined the previously functioning floor plan - so suggestions were needed on how more aesthetically pleasing stair floor plans are implemented where they were developed with the floor division instead of being transplanted across floors.What? I don't understand...