Opinions on the single-family house with a granny flat floor plans

  • Erstellt am 2018-12-08 23:18:46

kaho674

2018-12-09 17:44:35
  • #1

Yes, you can, because there are houses everywhere on it.


Well, we don’t know your development plan. Your information about it is too sparse. And in my opinion, you’re mixing up a few things there. Maybe you should take another close look.

Yes, then the roof shape would be completely different. So what?

What does the use of the roof have to do with the development plan? If you’re allowed to build two roofs, then surely also just one.

But if there is no shortage of money and the rest of the land is enough for you, then just enclose a bit more unused airspace. The carpenter will be happy. Maybe you’ll need him for something someday – who knows.
 

11ant

2018-12-09 17:56:37
  • #2
I consider the latter likely, especially given your strange indication of floor area ratio and plot ratio. Tell me the municipality and the development plan designation, then one can look it up. Different heights etc. for single- and multi-storey buildings typically apply to different building plots.
 

haydee

2018-12-09 19:42:24
  • #3
The narrow corridor on the upper floor. What do you want to put in there? A cleaning supplies cabinet is too deep. In the northeast children's room, you will need much more light. It is too dark in the late afternoon for homework in daylight for some. Ah, the dining area is intended as a good parlor. I maintain that a proper eat-in kitchen without a makeshift solution at the kitchen counter is better. The grandparents are supposed to look after the children. Be it in the evening, after school, or if the child is sick. Also, the grandparents will sometimes need some help themselves. Do you really want to go out in bad weather? There are even multi-generation houses that have a planned communal area. Whether you want the latter is up to you—it certainly has its advantages. A connecting door is a must and not a restriction on privacy.
 

fullkehr

2018-12-09 19:48:08
  • #4


1. Building Heights The reference height point for determining the building height (height of finished ground floor level, ridge height, eaves height) is the intersection of the centerline of the public access road – top edge of finished street surface – with the extended centerline of the respective building plot running perpendicular to the public access road (plot axis)

1.1 The height of the finished ground floor level in the center of the building, measured from the reference height point, must not exceed 0.5 m.

1.2 In the area of the plan where the representation of the HQ has been adopted for information only, terrain elevations of private building plots up to 31 m above sea level (NN) must be made so that the height of the finished ground floor level lies above 31 m above NN. The elevation must be made with material suitable for the infiltration of surface water.

1.3 The eaves height of the buildings, measured from the top edge of the finished ground floor level to the intersection of the outer edge of the rising masonry with the roof covering, must not be lower or higher than the following values: - for a roof pitch under 30°: min. 4.00 m up to max. 5.80 m - for a roof pitch over 30°: max. 4.00 m

1.4 The maximum building height (ridge height), measured from the top edge of the finished ground floor level to the top edge of the ridge (highest point of the roof covering), must not exceed 9.00 m.
 

fullkehr

2018-12-09 20:00:24
  • #5


The storage room on the upper floor is 1.35 meters wide and up to the 2-meter line 3.50 meters long.
I do think quite a lot fits in there.
Suitcases, vacuum cleaner, cleaning supplies.

And regarding the entrances, I really see it differently. A connecting door is an absolute no-go…. What speaks against simply leaving the front door, walking the 6 meters across the covered area?
 

ypg

2018-12-09 20:24:42
  • #6


Why not? You can manage those few meters. I wouldn’t build an indoor connection either.


A lot fits in there, yes. But whether it can be carried out again is another matter. ;) It will work, but it’s not easy to carry a bulky item like a decorative box or suitcase past a cleaning shelf.

The kitchen can certainly be the heart of a house. It should be. But here it isn’t; it’s a passage room, more like a traffic area.
As the builder, I would be here with my plan exactly for this reason—to find out just that (because I hadn’t seen it myself) and to take the reins and change something again with a new design where the kitchen is exactly what you want: a central meeting point.
 

Similar topics
10.12.2012Terrain elevations in the development plan are incorrect.12
14.04.2015Uneconomic development plan31
20.04.2016Roof planning - Only gable roof or half-hip roof allowed15
21.02.2017Development plan difference between ground floor, roof, and single-storey17
13.08.2017Change of roof pitch from 25 degrees10
12.01.2018Building height of 8.5 m with basement and 2 full floors31
09.07.2018Demolition of existing house - new construction: what does the development plan allow?11
15.08.2018Basic floor area ratio / floor area ratio for plots without a development plan: How to calculate? Experiences?18
18.04.2019Development plan of 1998 - Setting the eaves height to a maximum of 3.00m12
31.12.2019Development plan and the resulting house plan44
03.02.2020Restrictive development plan - is buying land worth it?20
06.05.2020Liberation § 31 Building Code: Roof pitch, roof shape, roof structures15
14.04.2020How to obtain an exemption from the development plan?53
05.10.2020Questions about the development plan (full floors, knee wall)11
28.10.2020Single-family house with 160 m² - development plan, living area calculation19
24.01.2021Plot - Ideas and suggestions on orientation and development plan33
25.04.2022Interpret building plan / is it even feasible?70
15.05.2023Development plan: Definition of attic11
03.08.2024Nice plot of land, but is the development plan too restrictive?21
10.05.2025Floor plan of a single-family house measuring 14x14 meters with limited ridge height35

Oben