modern Bauhaus, lots of glass, 170 sqm ground floor/upper floor, currently in phase 3

Super, well then good luck.

Thanks to you too. I think you could manage with your budget. The heating/plumbing item is calculated quite high. I see potential for savings here. I find the house style very appealing, but the floor plan on the ground floor wouldn’t be for me. The idea of cooking-eating-living in a line feels uncomfortable to me. But that is certainly a matter of taste. Here is the floor plan of our ground floor in the final stage. The orientation is quite similar, but we still have a basement.

Thank you too. I think you could manage with your budget. The heating/plumbing item is calculated quite high. I see potential for savings here. I find the house style very appealing, but the floor plan on the ground floor is not for me. The idea of cooking-eating-living in a line feels uncomfortable to me. But that is certainly a matter of taste. Here is the floor plan of our ground floor in its final stage. The orientation is pretty much identical, but we still have a basement.

I really like your project. Thumbs up!

How am I supposed to understand that

Here is the floor plan of our ground floor in the final stage.

Yes, there are clearly some differences to be seen, but I mentioned your house more as an example of a house shape that I could imagine as a feasible approximation of the current plans of the OP to a less dramatic integration into his building area. In doing so, I deliberately did not link, for example, post 9858 , but rather the beginning of your thread to also read up on the evolution. Not least because your house did not start as, let's say, my favorite object and still hasn't become one, but it has developed.

also expects a rejection from the office, does not fit into the area

Possibly combine the whole thing with a very flat shed roof. That certainly makes it easier for the approval.

Perhaps the color concept, which actually looks somewhat like a roof, helps.

Replanning to a gable roof should be considered.

On the topic of wannabe Bauhaus in a §34 area from the 70s with so far exclusively gable roofs, I can only say that we got that approved without inquiry. So it is not impossible. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

The municipality does not prescribe this for fun.

and more (just as an example, please don't take it personally)

I’m doing this now in every thread so everyone finally gets it ;)
The roof shape has NO (!!!) relevance to the §34 requirement! Please do not unsettle people because of statements like these here and elsewhere on the net; back then, before the council meeting, we had sleepless nights exactly because of this, which is just so unnecessary.
The unfortunately no longer active , an absolute expert and professional specialist on this topic, has explained it to me (albeit too late for the nights) and actually to many others here again and again. And yes, that’s how it was in the meeting as well. The height of the buildings is usually the main criterion for the decision-makers, followed by other points. Just quote the § completely or refer to court rulings, e.g.

"...primarily offer the (absolute) size of the buildings according to ground area, floor area, number of storeys and height and, in the case of open development, additionally their ratio to the surrounding open space as a reference value for determining the permissible extent of structural use"

So yes, according to the TE’s pictures, the city/municipality could reject this, but not because of the roof shape...

The inactivity of and @kahoo harms the forum

with us, the roof shape was indeed an issue. But it is supposed to be fine if this supposedly does not matter.