Looking for a photorealistic 3D house planner program

  • Erstellt am 2017-12-07 00:22:35

ypg

2017-12-10 21:32:51
  • #1
1. I don’t believe you lose control if you let a professional do it. You didn’t sit down yourself and craft or 3D print an insole. You probably weren’t offered this insole because you didn’t ask the doctor about privately payable insoles. I either go to the pharmacy with a prescription or inquire there myself. Then I get advice. Not with a prescription, there’s only what is stated on it. But I don’t make diagnoses. If you yourself have no idea or concept of how to implement a 2D plan in 3D, how is a reasonable plan supposed to come out? From a layperson like you? An architect knows how it works. You have control when you check the plan afterwards.

2. In Arcon, you can also expand your database.

3. Arcon has not further developed graphically with the higher versions – it didn’t have to, because it is and has been sufficient for an architect for decades and still is now. Only the clients expect this gimmick and are disappointed when the architect picks up a pencil.

3a. Since I have had a Mac for 10 years and two years ago my PC crashed, my hands are unfortunately tied with objects. But you would be disappointed.

Honestly, I also find it unnecessary. Checking partition walls is enough for me when I see the dimensions; I work with placeholders anyway. For the small things here homebyme or the pencil are enough for me; for everything else, I consider the time here too precious.

4. One point reads to me as if you just want to play [emoji6]

4. Start walking before you practice cartwheels. Make drawings on graph paper. I have some tips for this in pinned posts. Acquaint yourself with the cardinal directions for room locations and alternatives. Draw on the site plan until you have a rough wall frame. Please see this only as a gimmick. Hand over your handwritten room program to an architect you trust and later compare layman with professional. Even control freaks can communicate [emoji6] You can also redraw the drawing from him; for that, Cadvilla is surely the right one [emoji2]
 

11ant

2017-12-10 21:46:00
  • #2
Spontaneous doodling flows more quickly from the wrist with a pencil than with the mouse, that's why I always say it. But unfortunately, it doesn't help: with (even only imagined) inability to think oneself into something three-dimensional, one then sits forever in front of the graph paper. Unless one takes to heart the advice then sooner or later the mental cinema of the images ingrained so far gives the rhythm that you have to go along with.
 

ruppsn

2017-12-10 23:09:20
  • #3
Sometimes I really find it hard to understand what you want to say to me or others. Could you please explain once more in simple words and straightforwardly what you mean? My interpretations were a bit off the last few times, so I’d rather ask again.
 

ruppsn

2017-12-10 23:16:27
  • #4
I suspected that I would get a "like" from you for that.
 

11ant

2017-12-11 00:37:37
  • #5

You recommended to the OP to train his sense of imagination – where, in my estimation, he only has supposed deficits – by means of googled floods of images. And I meant that when the absorbed images begin to work in him, they can then flow into a sketch of his future house faster through a pencil than through a mouse. Do you really need a reading aid for that?
 

ypg

2017-12-11 08:22:36
  • #6


You see [emoji2] Now you already have 2
 

Similar topics
19.07.2018Draw the plan yourself? Do you necessarily need an architect?11
16.04.2014Cost of soil survey - Does the architect pay or do we?12
25.02.2015Planning / Architect, involvement of specialist planners for the approval plan10
26.04.2015Semi-detached house architect or general contractor / prefabricated house or solid construction13
13.06.2017Architect or developer? Which is more affordable?13
24.06.2017Construction ancillary costs: Bank requires signature from the architect16

Oben