Loan agreement for only one person: advantages / disadvantages

We also have a marriage contract in which separation of property is agreed. I work part-time and was the one who stayed at home after the children were born. According to the typical cliché arguments here, this is a sexist disadvantage to me. However, I earn more part-time than my husband does full-time, even though he is an executive in a very large company. The horizon of some people here is actually very limited and almost zero. They then consider that their point of view.

That is not the standard

And about sexism in general: Has any of the many men here in the forum ever had to be called a "career man" with a gross salary of 4000 or more?

Regarding "well" earning women, you dropped the K-word with such ease... think about it.

equal Pay. I already said a few posts earlier that men always have it easier and faster to achieve good salaries. The lady earning 4000€ has such a broad horizon that she would not sign a prenuptial agreement in an equal partnership.

That is not the standard

And you define the standard?
In our environment, that is at least nothing unusual.

And you define the standard? In our environment, that is at least nothing unusual.

And what motivation did you have for a prenuptial agreement? That your husband doesn't get any of your income?

And what motivation did you have for a prenuptial agreement? That your husband doesn't get any of your income?

I also "get" "nothing" from his income. The difference between our incomes is not large. We can both live wonderfully off our respective incomes, even in the event of a separation. Anything else would be immoral and therefore void. On paper, we are completely financially separate. In the event of a divorce, no pension points will be divided either. In everyday life, we do not separate expenses; everyone has access to all accounts and sometimes pays from this one and sometimes from that one. Most financial investments are in both our names. Why do we do this? The fighting over finances is what people destroy themselves over in the event of a divorce. We do not want that. Should it come to that, everyone takes their own and leaves. There will be nothing financial left to settle—and therefore nothing to argue about. We are both rational people. We recognize the advantages of such a solution at a time when it is still possible. So on good terms, by prenuptial agreement.

I have probably never agreed with aero2016, but: I fully endorse that.

The factor of avoiding a bitter divorce battle is a main reason for a prenuptial agreement. It has nothing to do with sexism.