There are dozens of possibilities – the only question is whether you are allowed to do that in the end. And it depends on the house.
And there is no development plan? How is that supposed to be understood?
The development plan is from 1993 and during the time of zero interest rates, several new buildings have sprung up in the neighborhood that do not comply with it in the slightest.
A family friend built 20 meters away and from the roof angle, the enclosure, the number of floors to the brick color, nothing corresponds to the development plan and it was still approved. This concerns five new buildings – all not according to plan.
What does sensible mean? What has priority?
- short distances outside the house from the car (which of course must be parked warm in the double garage) to the house?
- orientation of the terrace
- light in rooms
- cost-effective development
- cost-effective land modeling
etc.
Priorities are:
- space for two mid-sized cars (as stated, it doesn’t matter whether garage, carport, or both, main thing is reasonably dry)
- if no garage, then an additional storage room for bicycles, garden tools, etc.
- as short as possible distances garage-house, street-front door, but it doesn't have to be directly on the street (because of the wedge)
- my wife would like a "U" layout over east-south-west for the terrace, if feasible, but not a must
- we would like to arrange the living rooms accordingly, but we would have that planned individually
- development distance within the property does not matter
- the 1.5m slope doesn’t look very steep in reality, I can’t quite imagine it built on. A plan would of course be great, but how to implement it I don’t know (as mentioned, the neighbors to the east suggested the L-stone solution, but it was already said that that is nonsense)
A must are the 3 meters distance to the south and north, that is what the city requires.
I don’t need ready-to-build drafts either, just wanted to ask how it could be designed (if everything were allowed).