exto1791
2020-08-17 13:14:41
- #1
So you are claiming that all normal homebuyers of developers (semi-detached/townhouses) are unhappy in the long run? Well planned, they are completely sufficient. The rooms won't be the size of a ballroom, but that's not necessary to be happy.
And additionally. How unhappy are the tens or hundreds of thousands (or even more) of renters with 2 children, who in a 4-room apartment only have 100 sqm with two kids - but have to do without a garden?
Well, unhappy is a poor choice of words, sorry. Of course, someone with 2 children can be happy in 80 sqm.
What I’m getting at: I acquire property in which I might live for a lifetime, go into debt for a lifetime, but have to give up what maybe bothered me forever in the rental apartment? At least that’s how it is with us.
With such a project, I wouldn’t want to skimp. That’s just my opinion that I want to suggest to the OP.
Financial pressure often makes people inventive, which is not always positive. As I said… it always depends on what you want to do without or not. Then better save for 2 years, get 30k more and have 20 sqm more (as an example).
I know enough people I know who made exactly this "mistake" and now wish they had much more space.
Just as an example: “You’re having a third child, then what?” Then there really is no free room left to plan a child’s room.