One could see it that way. But where would humanity be today if it stuck to what it already had for resource reasons? What if people had been satisfied with the Golf IV? What if they had been satisfied with Windows XP? What if they had been satisfied with the first generation smartphone? What if people in the Middle Ages had been satisfied? Or the cavemen?
It doesn’t work like that. We live today the way we do because the people before us were not satisfied with what they had...
And therefore, the question of whether an internal combustion engine or a BEV is superior in terms of CO2 actually doesn't arise. In a world fully based on renewable energies, there is no way around the BEV because everything, or at least a great deal, simply runs on electrical energy.
And it just makes no sense to produce gasoline from electrical energy with high losses only to burn it in an engine with 30% efficiency.
The only exception I see: natural gas or methane for heating, whether in houses or in industry. It can be used with 100% efficiency and stored in huge quantities in the simplest way. And of course aviation, it won’t work without kerosene.
Militarily, it will in any case move toward 100% autonomous drones; tanks and artillery belong to the past.